PLR 200909027: Missing trust consents did not defeat S corporation status

Number
200909027
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
October 22, 2008
Publicly released
February 27, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation's three trust shareholders did not properly consent to its Form 2553 because their beneficiaries did not sign, and the form also contained clerical errors. The corporation represented that the failures were inadvertent, not motivated by tax avoidance, and that all affected returns had been filed consistently with S corporation treatment. The IRS granted relief under section 1362(f), treating the corporation as an S corporation for the relevant period if its election was otherwise valid and the parties continued consistent treatment. It also ruled that the facts did not disturb earlier relief for late qualified subchapter S trust elections.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could an S election remain effective despite missing trust-beneficiary consents and clerical errors on Form 2553?
  • Outcome: Approved: the IRS treated the invalid election as inadvertent and preserved prior trust-election relief.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362(a), (d), and (f); Rev. Proc. 98-55.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200909027
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/27/2009
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------------- --------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------
--------------------
-----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------
CC:PSI:B02
PLR-139730-08
Date:
October 22, 2008

X = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C = -----------------------

Trust1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust2 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust3 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

D1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D2 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D3 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D4 = ------------------------
PLR-139730-08
2

Dear -------------

This responds to a letter dated September 26, 2008, and subsequent correspondence submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting invalid election relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State on D1 under the name A and elected to be an S corporation effective D1. The X stockholders were C (an individual), Trust1, Trust2, and Trust3 (collectively, the Trusts). The beneficiaries of Trust1, Trust2, and Trust3 did not consent to the Form 2553, Election by a Small Business Corporation, for the Trusts. Consequently, Trust1, Trust2, and Trust3 did not properly consent to X’s election to be an S corporation. The failure of the Trusts’ beneficiaries to properly consent to X’s election made the election invalid on D1 under § 1362(a)(2). The Form 2553 also contained several clerical errors.

On D2, stockholders of X contributed their X shares to corporation B in exchange for the stock of B. On D4, X changed its name from A to X.

On D3, X represents that the IRS granted X relief pursuant to Revenue Procedure 98-55, 1998-2 C.B. 643, for inadvertent failure to timely make qualified subchapter S trust (QSST) elections for Trust1, Trust2, and Trust3.

X represents that the circumstances resulting in X’s invalid S corporation election were inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance. X further represents that from D1, X and its shareholders have filed all returns consistent with X’s status as an S corporation. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which it was made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents, or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the event resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation, or (B) to acquire the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.
PLR-139730-08
3

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X’s S corporation election was ineffective for the taxable year beginning D1 because the failure of the Trust1 beneficiary, the Trust2 beneficiary, and the Trust3 beneficiary to consent on behalf of each Trust to X’s election to be an S corporation. We further conclude that the ineffectiveness of X’s S corporation election constituted an inadvertent invalid election within the meaning of § 1362(f). In addition, we conclude that the clerical errors on Form 2553 did not cause the election to be invalid. Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from D1 to D2, provided X’s S corporation election was otherwise valid and was not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d). If X or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above, this ruling is null and void.

Based on the information submitted, we rule that the facts set forth have no effect on the D2 inadvertent termination relief pursuant to Revenue Procedure 98-55 for inadvertent failure to timely make QSST elections for Trust1, Trust2, and Trust3. The inadvertent termination relief will remain in full force and effect.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed regarding X’s eligibility to be an S corporation or the validity of its S corporation election. Further, no opinion is expressed as to whether Trust1, Trust2, and Trust3 qualify as QSSTs.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to X's authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace