PLR 200909003: Missing ESBT election made S election ineffective

Number
200909003
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
November 17, 2008
Publicly released
February 27, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation timely filed an S election, but one shareholder was a trust that failed to elect treatment as an electing small business trust. The trust's beneficiary also signed Form 2553 individually instead of having the trustee sign it. The IRS found that these errors made the S election ineffective but that the ineffectiveness was inadvertent. It allowed S corporation treatment from the intended date if, within 60 days, the corporation filed a new Form 2553 and the trustee filed the missing ESBT election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation preserve S status after a trust shareholder failed to make an ESBT election and the wrong person signed Form 2553?
  • Outcome: Approved: the ineffective election was inadvertent, subject to corrective filings within 60 days.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b) and 1362(a), (d), and (f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(m)(2).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200909003
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/27/2009
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------


----------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
-----------------------
--------------------
----------------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B02
PLR-123597-08
Date:
November 17, 2008

Legend

X = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 1 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------

State = -------------

D1 = -------------------

D2 = ----------------

Dear ----------------

This responds to a letter dated May 5, 2008, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting inadvertent ineffective election relief pursuant to § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State on D1. X represents that it timely filed an S corporation election which was intended to be effective on D2.

On D2, Trust’s assets included shares of X stock. X represents that Trust was eligible to be an electing small business trust effective D2 and thereafter. However, no election to be to an electing small business trust was filed on behalf of Trust. Therefore, the Trust was not a permissible shareholder, and X’s S corporation election was ineffective
PLR-123597-08
2

In addition, the beneficiary of Trust signed the Form 2553 in an individual capacity, rather than as trustee of Trust. X was not aware of the requirement that the trustee of an ESBT, rather than the beneficiary, must sign the Form 2553.

X represents that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness of X’s S corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. Additionally, X represents that X and its shareholders have filed their federal income tax returns consistent with having a valid S corporation election in effect for X. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to
§ 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents, or (B) was terminated under paragraph (2) or (3) of § 1362(d); (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the event resulting in the ineffectiveness, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation, or (B) to acquire the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X’s S corporation election was ineffective on D2 because X had an ineligible shareholder. We also conclude that the election was inadvertently ineffective under
§ 1362(f). Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from D2 and thereafter, provided that X files a new Form 2553 effective D2 and the trustee of Trust files an ESBT election effective D2, pursuant to the procedures set forth in § 1.1361-1(m)(2), with the appropriate service center within 60 days of the date of this letter, and provided that X’s election to be an S corporation was not otherwise ineffective and was not terminated under § 1362(d). A copy of this letter should be attached to the Form 2553 and the ESBT election.
PLR-123597-08
3

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being forwarded to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Melissa C. Liquerman
Chief, Branch 2
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace