CCA 200907030: An operating agreement cannot replace the statutory signer rule
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel addressed whether an LLC operating agreement could validate a partnership return signature. The advice states that the agreement is irrelevant if the signer was not a partner as required by statute. A private operating agreement cannot override the statutory return-signing rule.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can an operating agreement authorize a non-partner to satisfy the statutory signature requirement for a partnership return?
- Outcome: Advice given: no, the agreement cannot override the statute's requirement that the signer be a partner.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6063.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-819144-08 Number: 200907030
Release Date: 2/13/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6063.00-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:44 AM
To: ----------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Notice 2004-8 and LLCs
I think that the operating agreement would be irrelevant if the person who signed was not a "partner" as
required by the statute. The operating agreement cannot repeal the statute.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace