CCA 200907029: An invalid partnership return left the limitations period open

Number
200907029
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Extension by Agreement
Code sections
§ 761, § 6063, § 6229
Ruling dated
August 18, 2008
Publicly released
February 13, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that a general Form 872 does not extend the assessment period for partnership items or affected items unless it specifically references tax attributable to partnership items. The appropriate forms would be Form 872-P for the partnership or Form 872-i for an individual partner. A partnership return also must be signed by a partner, which for an LLC means a member. Because an owner of a trust partner lacked authority to sign for the trust, only its trustee could do so, no valid partnership return had been filed and the section 6229 limitations period had not begun.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the consent form extend the partnership-item assessment period, and had that period begun after an unauthorized signer filed the return?
  • Outcome: Advice given: the general consent was insufficient, and the period had not begun because no valid partnership return was filed.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 761(b), 6063, and 6229(b)(3).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-818162-08 Number: 200907029
Release Date: 2/13/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6229.02-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:29 PM
To: ----------------------

Cc: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: RE: Notice 2004-8 and LLCs

Your bigger problem is that a Form 872 does not extend the period for assessing partnership items or affected items. See I.R.C. 6229(b)(3) (Form 872 must specifically reference tax attributable to partnership items). A Form 872-P (or a Form 872-i for an individual partner) is used to extend the period for assessing partnership items and affected items arising from a TEFRFA partnership.

The good news is that a partnership return must be signed by a "partner". I.R.C. 6063. For these purposes that would be a "member" of the LLC. See I.R.C. 761(b). The owner of the trust partner had no authority to sign on behalf of the trust since only a trustee of the trust would have such power. Since no valid partnership return was filed, the statute of limitations under section 6229 has not yet begun to run.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace