PLR 200903078: S corporation shareholders could replace the simplified look-back method with the actual method

Number
200903078
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Look-Back Method
Code sections
§ 460, § 6110
Ruling dated
October 8, 2008
Publicly released
January 16, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Shareholders of an S corporation had elected the simplified marginal impact method to calculate look-back interest on their shares of long-term contract income and expense. They asked to revoke that election and use the actual method instead. The IRS consented, allowing the shareholders to begin using the actual method in the requested later year. If they want to elect the simplified method again within six years, they must first obtain the Commissioner’s consent. The ruling had to be attached to their federal income tax return for the year of change.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the shareholders revoke their simplified marginal impact method election and use the actual look-back method?
  • Outcome: Approved. They could use the actual method beginning in the requested year
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. § 1.460-6(c)(3) and (d)(4)(ii)(B)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200903078 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/16/2009 Date of Communication: Not Applicable Person To Contact: Index Number: 460.02-01 ----------------------, ID No. ------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------- CC:ITA:B05
--------------------------- PLR-137193-08
Date:
October 08, 2008

Taxpayer: ------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------

Year A: -------

Year B: -------

Dear -------------------------:

This ruling responds to a request for the Commissioner’s consent to revoke an election. The representations supporting this request are summarized below.

The taxpayers are shareholders in an S corporation, a pass-through entity, and file their federal income tax return on a calendar year basis.

The S corporation enters into long-term contracts and accounts for them using the percentage-of-completion method (PCM). The taxpayers elected under § 1.460- 6(d)(4)(ii)(B) to use the simplified marginal impact method (“SMIM”) to compute the amount of look-back interest with respect to their share of long-term contract income and expense reported by the pass-through entity. The election was effective with the S election of the corporation on July 1, in Year A. If consent is granted by the Commissioner to revoke the election, taxpayers will begin computing look-back using the “actual method” provided in § 1.460-6(c)(3).

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, the request to revoke the election under § 1.460-6(d)(4)(ii)(B) is granted. Thus, taxpayers may begin computing their look-back interest using the actual method, rather than the SMIM, beginning in Year B. However, should taxpayers desire to re-elect the SMIM within the next six years, they must obtain the Commissioner’s prior consent.

A copy of this letter ruling should be attached to taxpayers’ federal income tax return for Year B.

No opinion is expressed concerning any other provisions of the Code or regulations that apply to the taxpayers.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling showing the deletions proposed to be made when it is disclosed under
§ 6110.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter ruling to your authorized representative.

Sincerely yours,

John M. Aramburu
Senior Counsel, Branch 5
(Income Tax & Accounting)
Office of Chief Counsel

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace