PLR 200903067: Convertible notes did not end S status after inadvertent-termination relief

Number
200903067
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 1366, § 1367, § 1368, § 6110
Ruling dated
September 22, 2008
Publicly released
January 16, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation issued notes that could convert into its stock. Because convertible debt can be treated as a second class of stock, the notes may have terminated the company’s S election before they converted. The IRS found that any termination was inadvertent and allowed the company to be treated as continuously maintaining S status. Relief depended on the original election being valid, no other termination occurring, and the shareholders consistently reporting their shares of corporate items, basis adjustments, and distributions under the S corporation rules. Failure to follow those conditions would make the ruling void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation retain continuous S status after convertible notes may have created a prohibited second class of stock?
  • Outcome: Approved. Any termination was treated as inadvertent, subject to reporting conditions
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(iv)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200903067 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/16/2009 Date of Communication: Not Applicable Person To Contact: Index Number: 1362.04-00 -------------------, ID No. ------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------
----------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------- CC:PSI:B02
--------------------------------------------------- PLR-119676-08
-------------------------------- Date:
September 22, 2008

X = ---------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------

Date 1= ----------------

Date 2= ------------------

Date 3= ------------------

Date 4= ------------------

Date 5= -------

Dear ---------------:

This responds to a letter dated April 24, 2008, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

X was incorporated on Date 1 and made an election to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 2. X’s election may have been inadvertently terminated effective Date 3 when X issued notes to a number of individuals, since these notes were convertible to X stock on Date 4. X discovered this problem on Date 5, by which time the notes had already converted to X stock.

X represents that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Section 1361(a) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under section 1362(a) is in effect for the year.

Section 1361(b)(1) provides that the term “small business corporation” means a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that meets the requirements specified in section 1361(b)(1)(A) through (D).

Section 1361(b)(1)(D) provides that S corporations may not have more than one class of stock.

Section 1.1361-1(l)(4)(iv) provides that a convertible debt instrument is considered a second class of stock if: (1) it would be treated as a second class of stock under § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(ii); or (2) it embodies rights equivalent to those of a call option that would be treated as a second class of stock under § 1.1361-1(l)(4)(iii).

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
§ 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the possible termination of X’s S corporation election on Date 3 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). We further conclude that, pursuant to the provisions of
§ 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date 3 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under § 1361(d).

This ruling is conditioned upon the shareholders of X including in income their pro rata share of the separately stated and nonseparately computed items of X as provided in § 1366, making any adjustments to basis as provided in § 1367, and taking into account any distributions made by X as provided in § 1368. If X or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above, this letter ruling shall be null and void.

Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(j)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Michael Skeen
Acting Chief, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures: 2
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace