PLR 200850057: a 60-day rollover waiver denied because the one-year rule carries no waiver power

Number
200850057
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Rollover Contributions
Code sections
§ 72, § 408, § 408(a)(6), § 408(d), § 408(d)(1), § 408(d)(3), § 408(d)(3)(A), § 408(d)(3)(A)(i), § 408(d)(3)(B), § 408(d)(3)(D), § 408(d)(3)(E), § 408(d)(3)(I)
Ruling dated
September 18, 2008
Publicly released
December 12, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

This is a denial, and the reason it fails is not the reason the taxpayer was arguing about.

Taxpayer A, age 80, held two accounts at Financial Institution B: IRA Account D, a qualified individual retirement arrangement, and an ordinary taxable account. Late in the year he withdrew Amount 1 from the IRA and Amount 2 from the taxable account and put both into Account E, a new IRA at Financial Institution C. Moving Amount 1 that way was a valid rollover. Moving Amount 2 that way was a mistake, because it pushed non-IRA money into an IRA.

A few days later, in a confused and disoriented state, he insisted on pulling everything back out of the new IRA rather than just the non-IRA money, and put the whole sum into a non-qualified certificate of deposit. A footnote records that he handed the Member Services Representative a note saying he wanted to "correct a mistake". He only learned what he had done when he took his records to his tax preparer, by which time the 60 days had run. He asked the Service to waive the 60-day rollover deadline as to Amount 1.

Section 408(d)(3)(I) lets the Service waive that deadline where enforcing it would be against equity or good conscience, and his facts are the sort that provision was written for. But the Service never reached the question, because a different rule had already closed the door. Section 408(d)(3)(B) allows only one tax-free IRA rollover in any one-year period, and Amount 1 had already used it up weeks earlier on the way into Account E. Congress gave the Service power to waive the 60-day requirements of sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D), and no power at all over section 408(d)(3)(B). So no waiver could make the second movement a rollover, however sympathetic the circumstances.

The result is that his own successful rollover is what defeated him. The first transfer both created the problem he was trying to fix and spent the one rollover he was allowed, which left the correction itself unavailable. The withdrawal is a taxable event under section 408(d)(1), reportable under the rules of section 72.

This document shows the redaction machinery failing in an unusual way. The identifying details were removed with runs of asterisks, and the scan turned those runs into strings of nonsense letters, so the legend that should define Taxpayer A, the institutions, the accounts and the amounts is unreadable, and every date in the narrative survives only as a block of stray characters. The two dates that matter to the holding, the day of the first rollover and the day of the withdrawal, are both gone, so the one-year computation cannot be checked from the face of the document. This is a defect in the released file and is left exactly as published.

Two smaller renderings are worth recording. The same provision is printed as section 408(d)(3)(I) in one sentence and as section 408(d)(3)(1) in the next, the capital letter having been read as a digit. And the ordinal "60th" appears twice in the quoted statute in two different broken forms. One legend entry reading "Amount 41" is corrected here to "Amount 1", the figure used throughout the rest of the letter. The lowercase "institution C" that appears where a line wraps is the document's own text and is kept.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will the Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement of section 408(d)(3) with respect to Amount 1, which Taxpayer A withdrew from IRA Account E while confused and disoriented and deposited into a non-qualified certificate of deposit?
  • Outcome: Denied. The one-rollover-per-year bar of section 408(d)(3)(B) had already been triggered by the earlier rollover from IRA Account D into IRA Account E, and the Service has no authority to waive that rule. The withdrawal is a taxable event under section 408(d)(1).
  • Key authorities: Sections 408(d)(1), 408(d)(3)(A), 408(d)(3)(A)(i), 408(d)(3)(B), 408(d)(3)(D) and 408(d)(3)(I); section 72.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 2 U Us 3 G U a ¢

3 =) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
ON > WASHINGTON. D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT? ENTITIES SEP 18 2008
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

HHI AH IAAE AEE EEREEERERERE
RRR EREREEERKEIEEEE

RKAHARA RHEE

KEKKKKKEERRKEEKEERENEKEKAKEKREAR ERA WEEK

Legend:
Taxpayer A aI IRR IIR III RETR IT
SAKINA EAE HHI RE
Financial Institution B ma FERRARA NRHA RII RIT IE 1 Financial Institution C = RAHA HERRERA AEAERE IRA Account D aI II IIR IRIE I RI RIOT IIIT RRR AKER ARTA RRERE REET IRA Account E RRR RIAA RRR AR IRATE RITA TE Amount 1 ERR A AAA RARE TERRE ERE REE Amount 2 ND Ei tk del laladalal

RAEKKARKKREKAREEEERHAEAEAKERE »

This letter responds to correspondence dated April 11, 2007, as supplemented by additional correspondence dated June 8, 2007, in which your authorized representative requested, on your behalf, a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the requested ruling:

Taxpayer A, age 80, maintained two accounts with Financial Institution B. Account D was a qualified individual retirement arrangement (“IRA”) established and maintained under section 408 of the Code; a second account is described as a “regular account” that was not part of a qualified retirement arrangement. In late * **, Taxpayer A withdrew Amount 1 from IRA Account D and Amount 2 from his regular account at Financial Institution B, and deposited both Amounts 1 and 2 into Account E, a new IRA that he established at Financial institution C. Because Amount 2 came from Taxpayer A’s nonqualified account at Financial Institution B, it represented a transfer of non-IRA money into IRA Account E.

A few days later, on *"" *, Taxpayer A, in a confused and disoriented state,' insisted on withdrawing both Amounts 1 and 2 (rather than withdrawing only Amount 2, the non-IRA money) from IRA Account E. Taxpayer A then deposited Amounts 1 and 2 into a non-qualified certificate of deposit at Financial Institution C. Taxpayer A became aware of his mistake with regard to his IRA assets when he went to his tax preparer in sete #% for preparation of his * income tax return. At that time the 60-day period for completion of a rollover to another IRA had expired. Moreover, Taxpayer A had received Amounts 1 and 2 from IRA Account E on ** =, "", and Amount 1 had been rolled over previously from IRA Account D to IRA Account E in November of the same year.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) waive the 60 day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Code in this instance with respect to Amount 1.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if:

1 at the time he withdrew all the money from his IRA at Financial Institution C, Taxpayer A penned a note to the Member Services Representative at Financial Institution C stating that he wanted to “correct a mistake” that he had made by depositing Amount 2 in a Financial Institution C IRA.

  1. 2UU85005%

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60° day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60"" day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without

regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not

apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60- day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(1) of the Code.

While the Congress has authorized the Service to waive the 60-day requirement of section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code for rollovers of IRA assets in appropriate circumstances, no similar authority exists for the Service to waive the rule of section 408(d)(3)(B). Thus, once a Taxpayer has completed a valid IRA rollover, he or she is barred from completing another valid rollover for a period of 1 year after the first rollover occurred.

200850057

In this case, Taxpayer A completed a valid, qualified rollover from IRA Account D to IRA Account E in * of . When Taxpayer A again withdrew his IRA assets from Account E on * *, **, section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code barred the application of the rollover rule of section 408(d)(3)(A) with respect to any subsequent attempt to complete a rollover of the IRA assets received by Taxpayer A on KARR mr salt Ie Therefore, Taxpayer A’s keakkkake * kkk withdrawal of IRA funds (Amount 1) from IRA Account E is a taxable event under section 408(d)(1) of the Code, and the Service must decline to provide a waiver of the 60-day rule in this case.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

The original of this letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:1T1.

Sincerely,

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace