CCA 200848076: Defective conservation easement acknowledgment bars the deduction

Number
200848076
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Recordkeeping and Return Requirements
Code sections
§ 170
Ruling dated
August 27, 2008
Publicly released
November 28, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that a charitable deduction of $250 or more for a conservation easement requires a contemporaneous written acknowledgment from the donee. The writing must describe the contributed property, state whether the donee provided goods or services, and give a good-faith value estimate if it did. Cash counts as goods or services for this rule. An instrument that merely documents a sale and omits the goods-or-services statement is not sufficient. The taxpayer must receive a compliant acknowledgment by the earlier of filing the original return or its due date, including extensions, and cannot cure a defect later to obtain a full or partial deduction.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What must a contemporaneous written acknowledgment contain and when must it be received for a conservation easement deduction?
  • Outcome: Advice given. A sale document lacking the required contribution and consideration statements is insufficient, and a late cure cannot preserve any deduction.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 170(f)(8); Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-13(f); Addis v. Commissioner, 374 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2004).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2008082713405950 Number: 200848076
Office: ----------------
Release Date: 11/28/2008

UILC: 170.18-00

From: ---------------
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 1:41:01 PM
To: ---------------
Cc: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Conservation easement case

-------------

No deduction is allowed under § 170(a) for a qualified charitable contribution (including a qualified conservation contribution) of $250 or more unless the taxpayer substantiates the contribution by a contemporaneous written acknowledgment of the contribution by the donee organization. IRC § 170(f)(8)(A). If an acknowledgment fails to contain the required information or the taxpayer fails to receive the acknowledgment within the required time, § 170(f)(8)(A) is clear that no deduction under § 170 is allowed (i.e., taxpayers may not cure the defect after the fact and receive a whole or partial deduction). See, e.g., Addis v. Commissioner, 374 F.3d 881, 887 (9th Cir. 2004) (consequence of acknowledgment that did not contain required information is total denial of deduction; partial deduction foreclosed by statute), affg. 118 T.C. 528 (2002).

Content of acknowledgment. A contemporaneous written acknowledgment with respect to the contribution of a conservation easement to a donee organization must include the following information:

  1. a description (but not necessarily the value) of the property contributed;

  2. whether the donee organization provided any goods or services in consideration, in whole or in part,
    for the contributed property; and

  3. if goods or services were provided in consideration for the contributed property, a good faith
    estimate of the value of such goods or services. IRC § 170(f)(8)(B); Reg. § 1.170A-13(f)(2).

"Goods or services" includes cash. Reg. § 1.170A-13(f)(5).

Timing of acknowledgment. The acknowledgment required under § 170(f)(8)(A) is considered to be "contemporaneous" if the taxpayer obtains the acknowledgment on or before the earlier of--

  1. the date on which the taxpayer files a return for the taxable year in which the contribution was
    made, or

  2. the due date (including extensions) for filing such return. IRC § 170(f)(8)(C); Reg. § 1.170A-13(f)(3).

A writing that: (1) does not acknowledge a contribution of property but, instead, merely evidences a sale of the property (regardless of the actual value of the property) and (2) does not include a statement of whether any goods or services have been provided for the contribution is not a contemporaneous written acknowledgment under § 170(f)(8). A writing that does contain the required information under § 170(f)(8)(B) must be received by the taxpayer before the taxpayer files its original return for the taxable 2

year in which the contribution was made (or the due date, including extensions, for filing that return -- whichever is earlier).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
---------------
---------
-
-
--------------------------------------------------------
----------------
-----------------------------
---------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
---------------------
---------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace