CCA 200848061: State-law authority controls who signs for a tiered tax matters partner
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel answered several questions about selecting and acting through a tax matters partner in tiered entity structures. When an LLC has no designated member-managers, each member is treated as one and TMP selection proceeds as though each were a general partner, while a limited partner lacking state-law authority to bind the partnership cannot serve. An LLC may itself be the TMP, but a person with state-law power to bind that LLC must sign a limitations extension on its behalf. The structure of still-lower tiers does not change that rule. Filing a partnership return does not make a single-member LLC eligible to be classified as a partnership. A general partner whose items converted through a settlement remains TMP except when conversion occurs under a special enforcement regulation, and dissolution of the key partnership does not itself end the partners' TEFRA proceeding.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Who may serve and sign as TMP when partnerships and LLCs are arranged in multiple tiers?
- Outcome: Advice given. Apply the TMP regulations and require a signer with state-law power to bind the entity serving as TMP.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.6231(a)(7)-1 and 301.6231(a)(7)-2; Chef's Choice.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2008073114072451 Number: 200848061
Office: ------------
Release Date: 11/28/2008
UILC: 6231.07-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 2:07:26 PM
To: -----------------------------------------------------------------
Cc: --------------------
Subject: Counsel questions for New Orleans meeting
Hi ---------,
The TMP answers are below, in red. Please let me know if you would like to discuss them further.
Thanks,
----------
From: ----------------------
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:16 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: -------------------
Subject: Counsel questions
---------,
To follow up on our phone conversation today, I said I would send you a list of the questions we had
for Counsel to address in the meeting. These are the ones we had so far.
Counsel Presentation
1. Hot Topics – what’s happening with p’ships, recent court cases etc
- TMP issues
· designation of TMP for an LLC with no member managers
o If there are no member-managers, each member will be treated as a member-manager.
Treas. Reg. 301.6231(a)(7)-2. A TMP will then be designated in accordance with Treas.
Reg. 301.6231(a)(7)-1, with each member of the LLC treated as a general partner.
· designation of TMP for LLC with LP
o The limited partner cannot be designated TMP because a limited partner does not have
the power to bind the partnership under state law.
· designation for LLC and TMP is also LLC
o The TMP of an LLC can be another LLC. However, statute extensions must be signed
by a managing member of the second tier LLC in order to be binding on the partnership.
2
· discussion of who signs in various complicated scenarios and what the signature would look like: o TEFRA LP key case with a TEFRA LLC as its TMP. That LLC is also a TEFRA entity, with another LP as its TMP. Then finally, that LP is also a TEFRA entity with its TMP being a corporation. o Same scenario except the TEFRA LP key case TMP is another TEFRA LP. o Same scenario except the TEFRA LP key case TMP is a corporation which no longer exists.
§ In all of these scenarios, the structure of the lower tiers is irrelevant. The TMP is a creature of statute and has authority to extend the period of limitations for all of the partners, but has no power to bind the partnership itself. Consequently, the person who signs must have the power to bind the second-tier entity (the TMP of the TEFRA key entity) under state law. For example, if the TMP is itself an LLC, a manager under state law must sign for the LLC as TMP of the key entity, regardless of whether the LLC is manager-managed or member-managed.
§ Signature: TEFRA, LLC, TMP of TEFRA LP, by John Doe, manager.
§ John Doe should always be someone with the power to bind the second-tier: a general partner in the case of a partnership or a manager in the case of an LLC. o Same scenario except the TEFRA LP key case TMP is a single member LLC. What happens when the single member LLC has filed a partnership return?
§ A single member LLC cannot elect to be classified as a partnership and cannot file a partnership return. Although this issue has not been litigated, we would likely argue that a single member LLC should not be treated as a partnership simply by virtue of having filed a partnership return.
· discussion as to who the TMP is when the key case no longer exists. In this case who will sign a statute extension if necessary.
· o If the key case no longer exists, why would a statute extension be required? Under Chef's Choice, since a TEFRA proceeding is a class action of the partners and not the partnership, the continued existence of the partnership is irrelevant. Is that what you are getting at here?
· A limited partner (2-partner LP) wants to be designated as the TMP because the general partner (1% interest) who was the TMP has had his partnership items converted to non-partnership via a settlement agreement. o The settlement agreement and conversion will only affect the year(s) at issue in the FPAA. The partnership will continue with the general partner as TMP. A TMP whose items have converted under a settlement agreement remains the TMP. His status would only terminate if the conversion occurs under a special enforcement regulation (i.e., bankruptcy, jeopardy assessment, etc.). Treas. Reg. 301.6231(a)(7)- 1(L)(1)(iv).
- FPAA
· how to revise or can it be revised after issuance
3
· can we withdraw an FPAA
· can we issue more than 1 in tiering situation? If not, specifically how do we do
the FPAA? We want examples
- Parent and Sub
· notice prep
· 870PT when sub is ptr.
· Statutes - Transaction occurs in early year but loss taken at 1065 level in future year, or
transaction occurs in early year but loss taken by investor in subsequent year
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace