CCA 200848060: No agreed extension when unified credit eliminates gift tax liability

Number
200848060
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Estate and Gift Taxes
Code sections
§ 6501, § 6901, § 7477
Ruling dated
July 30, 2008
Publicly released
November 28, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that the limitations period could not be extended by agreement in a gift-valuation matter where the unified credit eliminated any actual tax liability. Although IRC § 6901 can make a donee liable for tax that follows transferred property, it applies only when tax is actually owed. The trustee therefore was not liable for the donor's valuation misstatement and could not agree to extend the period. The IRS instead had to issue a notice of determination under IRC § 7477 within the original limitations period. That notice would operate like a statutory notice even though no tax was at issue.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can a trustee agree to extend the gift-tax limitations period when a valuation issue produces no actual tax because of the unified credit?
  • Outcome: Advice given. No; issue a section 7477 notice of determination within the original period.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6501(c)(4), 6901, and 7477; Rev. Rul. 83-41.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-730803-08 Number: 200848060
Office: --------------
Release Date: 11/28/2008

UILC: 6501.07-18

From: ------------------
Sent: Wed 7/30/2008 8:03 AM
To: -----------------------
Cc: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Statute of Limitations Inquiries

----,

I believe that the ultimate answer to your question is that in the scenario described it is not possible to extend the SOL by agreement. As ------ pointed out the correct procedure would be to issue a Notice of Determination under section 7477. This has the same effect as issuing a statutory notice, except that there is no tax at issue. This must be done within the original SOL.

The basis for arguing that the trustee should be able to extend the SOL is that the liability for the gift tax follows the property. This is prescribed by IRC § 6901. Rev. Rul. 83-41 confirms that the donee of the gifted property can then extend the SOL for any 6901 liabilities. However, 6901 only applies to situations where there is an actual tax liability. In the factual situation you described there is not a tax liability due to the unified credit. Therefore the Trustee is not liable for the donor’s valuation misstatement and cannot agree to an extension of the SOL. This seems to be consistent with IRC § 6501(c)(4) which limits extensions of the SOL to any tax other than the estate tax. Because gift tax liability of a deceased individual becomes part of the deceased's estate, the inability to extend the gift tax liability conforms to the inability to extend the estate tax liability. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss this further.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------

------------------------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace