CCA 200848034: At-risk limits require affected-item notices after TEFRA proceeding

Number
200848034
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Affected Item
Code sections
§ 465, § 6229, § 6231
Ruling dated
July 14, 2008
Publicly released
November 28, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that a partner's at-risk amount is an affected item whose assessment period is extended by the TEFRA proceeding. The partnership case must determine the liabilities, their allocation, and whether they are recourse or nonrecourse. After that case ends, the IRS must issue affected-item deficiency notices to disallow deductions exceeding each partner's at-risk amount. IRC § 6229(d) requires those notices within one year of an FPAA default or court decision.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How and when does the IRS apply partners' at-risk limitations after a partnership proceeding?
  • Outcome: Advice given. Resolve liability characteristics in the TEFRA case, then issue affected-item notices within the one-year period.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 465, 6229(d), and 6231; Hambrose v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 298 (1992).

Full text (IRS public release)

1

ID: CCA-714100-08 Number: 200848034
Office: --------------
Release Date: 11/28/2008

UILC: 6231.05-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Mon 7/14/2008 10:09 AM
To: ----------------------
Cc: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: FPAA Review

At risk is an affected item whose statute is extended by the TEFRA proceeding. See Ginsburg v. Commissioner, --T.C. -- (2007); Hambrose v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 298 (1992). In the partnership proceeding we must determined the amount of liabilities, their allocation and whether they are recourse or non-recourse. Dakota Hills v. Commissioner. Following the TEFRA proceeding we will issue affected item notices of deficiency to disallow partnership deductions to the extent they exceed the partners' amounts at risk. We must issue such notices with one year of the FPAA default or court decision under section 6229(d).

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace