CCA 200848026: Form 872 signatures must precede the assessment deadline

Number
200848026
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Limitations on Assessment and Collection (Barred v. Not Barred)
Code sections
§ 6501
Ruling dated
July 7, 2008
Publicly released
November 28, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel found no problem with an unspecified Form 872 arrangement if both signatures were placed on the form before the assessment period expired. The advice also required no evidence that the taxpayer had tried to withdraw its signature. Counsel gave a letter or statements that the taxpayer no longer wanted the extension as examples of attempted retraction. The short email does not describe the underlying arrangement in more detail.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Was the described Form 872 arrangement acceptable for extending the assessment period?
  • Outcome: Advice given. It was acceptable if both signatures preceded the assessment deadline and the taxpayer had not tried to retract its signature.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6501

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2008070715573250 Number: 200848026
Office: --------------
Release Date: 11/28/2008

UILC: 6501.00-00

From: -----------------------
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:57:34 PM
To: ------------------------
Cc: ------------------
Subject: RE: Form 872 question

I am not aware of any problem with this as long as both signatures on the Form 872 occur prior to the assessment expiration date and there is no evidence that the taxpayer has attempted to retract its signature (such as sending a letter or making statements saying that the taxpayer no longer wants to agree to an extension). Just let me know if I can be of further assistance. Thanks.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace