PLR 200846017: Controlled group received more time to restore subsidiary value

Number
200846017
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Controlled Groups
Code sections
§ 382, § 957, § 6110
Ruling dated
August 5, 2008
Publicly released
November 14, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A parent corporation and foreign subsidiaries missed the deadline to elect under Treas. Reg. § 1.382-8(h) to restore subsidiary value after an ownership change. Their submissions showed that they acted reasonably and in good faith, requested relief before the IRS discovered the omission, and would not prejudice the government. The IRS granted a 45-day extension to file the election. Relief was conditioned on the group’s aggregate tax liability not being lower than it would have been with a timely election, accounting for the time value of money. The IRS did not decide whether an ownership change occurred, how much value could be restored, or the amount of any net operating losses.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent and its subsidiaries file the § 1.382-8(h) value-restoration election after the deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved. They received 45 days from the ruling date, subject to a tax-liability condition.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 382; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.382-8(h) and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200846017
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/14/2008
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 382.12-16
Person To Contact:
------------------
---------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------
---------------------
-------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------------
CC:CORP:B03
PLR-133680-08
Date:
August 5, 2008

Legend

Parent = --------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Electing Subs = -------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = ----------------------

Date 2 = -------------------

State X = -------------

Company Official = -----------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear ------------ -

This letter responds to a letter dated July 30, 2008, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election. Parent is requesting an extension of time for Parent and Electing Subs to file an election (the “Election”) to restore all of the value of Electing Subs to Parent under § 1.382-8(h) of the Income Tax Regulations with respect to an ownership change that occurred on Date 1. An extension of time to make an election to restore all of the value of other component members of Parent’s controlled group was granted in a letter ruling dated
PLR-133680-08
2

May 5, 2008 (PLR-112935-08, LTR 200831012). Citations in this letter to regulations under § 1.382-8(h) are to regulations in effect for the taxable year that included Date 1. The information submitted is summarized below.

For its taxable year that included Date 1, Parent was a State X corporation and the common parent of an affiliated group that filed a consolidated Federal income tax return. Parent has represented that each of the Electing Subs was a component member of Parent’s controlled group within the meaning of § 1.382-8(e)(2) and (3) both with respect to the taxable year to which the controlled group loss (the pre-change loss of Parent for years in which the electing member was part of the controlled group) is attributable and on Date 1. Parent has further represented that: (a) on Date 1 each of the Electing Subs was a controlled foreign corporation as defined in § 957(a); (b) none of the Electing Subs has been engaged in the conduct of a trade or business in the United States; and (c) none of Electing Subs filed a United States tax return for the period relevant to the Election.

Parent experienced an ownership change for purposes of § 382 on Date 1. As of Date 2, Parent’s consolidated group had substantial consolidated net operating loss carryovers.

Section 382(a) provides that the amount of the taxable income of any new loss corporation for any post-change year that may be offset by pre-change losses shall not exceed the § 382 limitation for such year. Under § 382(b)(1), the § 382 limitation is determined by multiplying the value of the old loss corporation by the applicable long- term tax-exempt rate.

A special rule designed to prevent "double counting" by controlled groups is set forth in
§ 1.382-8. Section 1.382-8(c)(1) requires that the value of the stock of each component member of the controlled group be reduced by the value of the stock owned by that component member in any other component member. For purposes of applying
§ 1.382-8, a consolidated group, loss group, or loss subgroup is treated as a single corporation pursuant to § 1.382-8(f). Component members of a controlled group can elect under § 1.382-8(c)(2) to restore some or all of the value to another component member. The election to restore value is made by following the procedures set forth in
§ 1.382-8(h).

The Election was required to be filed with Parent's income tax return for its taxable year that included Date 1. For various reasons, however, Parent and Electing Subs failed to make the Election in a timely manner.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
PLR-133680-08
3

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by regulations (i.e., § 1.382-8(h)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Parent and Electing Subs to file the Election, provided they show that they acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the government.

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent and Company Official explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to file the Election timely. The information establishes that the taxpayer requested relief under § 301.9100-1 before the failure to make the regulatory election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service. See § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i).

Based on the facts and information submitted, including the representations made, we conclude that Parent and Electing Subs have shown that they acted reasonably and in good faith, that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, an extension of time is granted under § 301.9100-3, until 45 days from the date on this letter, for Parent and Electing Subs to file the Election.

The above extension of time is conditioned on the taxpayers' (Parent's, Electing Subs', and the members of Parent's controlled group's) tax liability (if any) being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to the taxpayers' tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the Director’s office upon audit of the Federal income tax returns involved. Further, no opinion is expressed as to the Federal income tax effect, if any, if it is determined that the taxpayers' tax liability is lower. Section 301.9100-3(c).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In particular, we express no opinion with respect to whether an ownership change occurred, the amount of value, if any, that may be restored, or as to values or amounts of any consolidated net operating losses. Lastly, we express no opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any
PLR-133680-08
4

other section of the Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, filing the Election late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling.

For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3, we relied on certain statements and representations made by Parent and Company Official under penalties of perjury. The Director, however, should verify all essential facts. Moreover, notwithstanding that the extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the Election, any penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable still apply.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer or taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Parent's authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

_______
Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace