PLR 200845003: Trust errors did not end corporation’s S status

Number
200845003
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 671, § 676, § 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
July 10, 2008
Publicly released
November 7, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

S corporation stock remained in a former grantor trust beyond the two-year period following the owner’s death, making the trust an ineligible shareholder. The stock later moved to a marital trust, but its beneficiary failed to file the required qualified Subchapter S trust election. The IRS found both actual and potential terminations inadvertent because the parties mistakenly believed the stock had passed directly to the surviving spouse, consistently filed as an S corporation, and agreed to corrective adjustments. The corporation could continue to be treated as an S corporation, with the surviving spouse treated as the stock owner during the relevant periods. Relief required the beneficiary to file a QSST election effective on the transfer date within 60 days, and it remained subject to the corporation’s election being otherwise valid.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation retain S status after a trust became ineligible and a later QSST election was omitted?
  • Outcome: Approved. Both termination events were treated as inadvertent, conditioned on a timely corrective QSST election and otherwise valid S status.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 671, 676, 1361(c), 1361(d), 1362(d), 1362(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200845003
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/7/2008
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1362.04-00
--------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
----------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------
CC:PSI:B02
-----------------------------------
PLR-103716-08
-------------------------
Date:
July 10, 2008

X = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------

Trust1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust2 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

D1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D2 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D3 = -----------------

D4 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D5 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D6 = ----------------------
PLR-103716-08
2

Dear -----------------

This responds to a letter dated January 23, 2008, and subsequent correspondence submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting inadvertent termination relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State on D1 and elected to be an S corporation effective D2. Pursuant to an agreement dated D3, A established Trust1, a revocable trust treated as a wholly-owned grantor trust under §§ 671 and 676. A transferred A’s shares of X stock to Trust1. On D4, A died and Trust1 continued to hold the X stock but ceased to qualify as a grantor trust. B, A’s spouse, and B’s accountants mistakenly assumed that X stock, along with other closely held stock, had been transferred to B effective the date of A’s death on D4. From D4, B reported the income of X as if B owned X stock. Trust1 continued to qualify as an eligible S corporation shareholder under § 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) for the 2 year period beginning on the day of the deemed owner’s death and ending on D5. On D5, Trust1 became an ineligible S corporation shareholder and X’s S corporation election terminated because Trust1 did not make an ESBT election or distribute X stock. On D6, X stock was transferred to Trust2, a marital trust, created under the terms of Trust1. Trust2 qualified as a qualified subchapter S trust (QSST) under § 1361(d) with B as the beneficiary. Since B believed that B was the owner of X stock, B failed to file a QSST election required under § 1361(c)(2). Consequently, X’s S corporation election would have terminated on D6, due to the failure of B to file a QSST election for Trust2, had the election not already terminated on D5.

X represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of X’s S corporation election were inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance. X further represents that from D3, X and its shareholders have filed all returns consistent with X’s status as an S corporation. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which it was made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents, or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the event resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation, or (B) to acquire the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the
PLR-103716-08
3

corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X’s S corporation election terminated on D5 because Trust1 was no longer an eligible shareholder of X. We also conclude that this termination of X’s S election on D5 was an inadvertent termination within the meaning of § 1362(f). Moreover, had X’s S corporation election not terminated, it would have terminated on D6, due to B’s failure to file a QSST election for Trust2. Similarly, this termination of X’s S election on D6 would have been an inadvertent termination within the meaning of § 1362(f).

Therefore, we conclude that X will continue to be treated as an S corporation for the period from D5 and thereafter, provided that X’s S corporation election was valid and was not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d). During the period from D5 to D6, B will be treated as the owner of the X stock acquired by Trust1. After D6, Trust2 will be treated as if it was a QSST described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i), and B will be treated as the owner of the portion of Trust2 consisting of X stock.

This ruling is contingent upon Trust2 beneficiary filing a QSST election for the trust, with an effective date of D6, with the appropriate service center within 60 days of the date of this ruling and upon X’s S corporation election being valid and not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d). A copy of this letter should be attached to the QSST election.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed regarding X’s eligibility to be an S corporation or the validity of its S corporation election. Further, no opinion is expressed as to whether Trust2 qualifies as a QSST.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-103716-08
4

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter are being sent to X's authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace