PLR 200843012: Insolvent insurance subsidiary remained in its parent’s consolidated group
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A parent corporation wholly owned an insurance subsidiary that once qualified as a life insurance company and therefore was excluded from the parent’s consolidated group. The subsidiary later ceased to meet the life insurance reserve test in § 816, and a state court placed it into liquidation after finding it insolvent. The IRS explained that bankruptcy or insolvency alone does not end a corporation’s membership in an affiliated group. Based on the taxpayer’s representations, the IRS ruled that the subsidiary was a member of the parent’s affiliated group and had to be included in its consolidated federal income tax return while the § 1504 affiliation tests remained satisfied. The subsidiary could not file a separate return unless the IRS granted the parent permission to discontinue consolidated filing.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Must the insolvent subsidiary be included in its parent’s consolidated federal income tax return after it ceased to qualify as a life insurance company?
- Outcome: Approved. The subsidiary remained a member of the affiliated group and could not file separately without permission to discontinue consolidation.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 816, 1502, 1504; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-6(a), 1.1502-75(a)(2), 1.1502-75(c), 1.1502-77(a)(6)(i); Rev. Rul. 63-104; Rev. Rul. 84-170
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200843012 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 10/24/2008 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1502.06-00 --------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------------------------------- CC:CORP:06
-------------------- PLR-111796-08
------------------------------ Date:
--------------------------------- July 14, 2008
Legend
Parent = --------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Taxpayer = -----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
State = -------------------
Court = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Agency = -----------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------
PLR-111796-08 2
Date 5 = ----------------
Dear -----------------:
This responds to a letter dated March 4, 2008, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer,
requesting a ruling under section 1502 and the Treasury Regulations thereunder. The
material information is summarized below.
Taxpayer was formed in Year 1 as a State corporation that was wholly owned by
Parent. The information submitted indicates that Parent is a corporation which is the
parent of an affiliated group of corporations, and files a consolidated return. Until Year
2, Taxpayer met the § 816 definition of a “life insurance company,” and, therefore, was
not a corporation that was includible in Parent’s consolidated group. Parent did not
make an election under § 1504(c)(2) to file a life-nonlife consolidated return. As of Year
2, however, Taxpayer did not possess the requisite percentage of life insurance
reserves as required by § 816 and, therefore, failed to satisfy the definition of life
insurance company. On Date 5, under a final order of liquidation with a finding of
insolvency, Court granted Agency the authority to liquidate and wind up the affairs of
Taxpayer. Taxpayer will remain in existence during the liquidation process.
Taxpayer believes that it continues to be a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent.
Taxpayer has provided its separate company tax information to Parent for taxable Year
2 and Year 3 for inclusion in Parent’s consolidated return. Taxpayer has not filed
separate federal income tax returns for such years. However, Taxpayer believes it has
not been included in the Parent consolidated federal income tax return for such years.
Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-77(a)(6)(i) provides in part that the Commissioner may, upon
issuing to the common parent written notice that expressly invokes the authority of that
provision, deal directly with any member of the group with respect to its liability under §
1.1502-6 for the consolidated tax of the group. Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-6(a) provides in
part that the common parent and each subsidiary which was a member of the group
during any part of the consolidated return year shall be severally liable for the tax for
such year.
In a letter dated April 18, 2008, this office gave notice to Parent that, pursuant to Treas.
Reg. § 1.1502-77(a)(6)(i) (to the extent that Taxpayer was a member of the Parent
consolidated group), this office would deal directly with Taxpayer for the sole purpose of
considering Taxpayer's request for a ruling as to whether Taxpayer is a member of the
Parent consolidated group.
Section 1.1502-75(a)(2) provides generally that a group of affiliated corporations which
PLR-111796-08 3
filed a consolidated federal income tax return for a previous year must continue to file as
a consolidated group unless permission to discontinue consolidation under Treas. Reg.
§ 1.1502-75(c) is granted. Section 1504 provides in part that a corporation is a member
of an affiliated group so long as it is both an includible corporation and at least 80
percent of its stock, as measured by vote and value, is held by either the common
parent or by another member or other members of the group that themselves meet the
80 percent vote and value test.
The status of a corporation as bankrupt or insolvent does not in itself affect the status of
a corporation as member of an affiliated group. See Rev. Rul. 63-104, 1963-1 C.B. 172,
holding that an affiliated group of corporations must continue to file consolidated returns
where a member of the group is involved in bankruptcy proceedings and the trustee in
bankruptcy fails or refuses to file a Form 1122 consenting to the filing of such return.
Furthermore, Rev. Rul. 84-170, 1984-2 C.B. 245, holds that a state superintendent must
continue to file a federal income tax return for an insurance company so long as the
company is considered to continue in existence for federal income tax purposes.
The following representations have been made in connection with the ruling request:
(a) Beginning with tax Year 2, Taxpayer does not meet the definition of a “life
insurance company” under I.R.C. § 816.
(b) Parent owns 80 percent or greater of the vote and value of Taxpayer’s shares of
stock subject to the authority granted to Agency under a State statute.
(c) Parent files a U.S. consolidated tax return.
(d) Taxpayer has prepared and delivered to Parent pro forma 1120-PC tax returns
for Year 2 and Year 3. Taxpayer intends to prepare and deliver to Parent a pro
forma 1120-PC tax return for Year 4.
Based on the information supplied and representations made by Taxpayer, it is held as
follows:
(1) Taxpayer is a member of the Parent affiliated group and must be included in the
Parent group’s consolidated federal income tax return as long as Taxpayer continues to
meet the tests for affiliation under section 1504, unless and until permission to
discontinue consolidation under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(c) is granted to Parent.
(2) Unless permission to discontinue consolidation under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-
75(c) is or has been granted to Parent, Taxpayer may not file a separate company tax
return.
PLR-111796-08 4
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent
to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Alfred C. Bishop, Jr.
Branch Chief, Branch 6
(Corporate)
cc:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace