PLR 200842022: S corporation status continues through ineligible trusts and three late QSST elections

Number
200842022
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
July 8, 2008
Publicly released
October 17, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation's election terminated when one trust became an ineligible shareholder and would have terminated again when a second trust became ineligible. Their stock was later transferred to three new trusts that were represented as eligible qualified subchapter S trusts, but the beneficiaries did not timely make QSST elections. The corporation represented that the failures were inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. The IRS preserved continuous S corporation treatment from the first termination date and treated the new trusts as QSSTs, assuming they otherwise qualify. Each income beneficiary must file a QSST election effective on the transfer date within 60 days, or the ruling becomes void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the corporation retain continuous S status despite two ineligible trusts and three missed QSST elections?
  • Outcome: Approved. Continuous treatment is preserved if the three beneficiaries file timely remedial QSST elections and all other conditions are met.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(d), 1362(d), 1362(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200842022
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/17/2008
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1362.04-00
--------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------------
---------------------
---------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-------------------------
CC:PSI:02
----------------
PLR-122239-08
------------------------
Date:
July 08, 2008

LEGEND:

X = ----------------------------
---------------------------------------------------

D1 = ---------------------------

D2 = ---------------------------

D3 = --------------------------

Trust 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
------------------------

Trust 2 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
------------------------

Trust 3 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

PLR-122239-08
2

Trust 4 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

Trust 5 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

Dear ---------------:

This responds to a letter dated May 8, 2008, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

X made an election to be treated as an S corporation. X’s election was inadvertently terminated effective D1 because X’s stock was held by Trust 1, which became an ineligible shareholder effective D1. X’s election would have inadvertently terminated effective D2 had it not already terminated because stock was held by Trust 2, which became an ineligible shareholder effective D2. On D3, the stock held by Trust 1 and 2 was transferred to Trusts 3, 4 and 5 (New Trusts), which the taxpayer has represented as being eligible to make qualified subchapter S trust (QSST) elections. However, the beneficiaries of the New Trusts failed to make timely QSST elections. Therefore, X’s election would have terminated D3, had it not already terminated. X represents that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the

PLR-122239-08
3

corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the termination of X’s S corporation election on D1 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). We further conclude that X’s S election would have inadvertently terminated within the meaning of § 1362(f) on D2 and D3. Pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from D1 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

Additionally, New Trusts will be treated as QSSTs described in § 1361(d)(3) (assuming that they qualify as QSSTs), and each QSST income beneficiary will be treated as the owner of X stock held by the New Trusts, provided that the income beneficiaries file QSST elections effective D3 with the appropriate service center within 60 days following the date of this letter. If New Trusts’ income beneficiaries fail to file the QSST elections, this ruling is null and void. A copy of this letter should be attached to the QSST elections.

Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the Code. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(j)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures: 2
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace