PLR 200841016: Late accounting-period change request is treated as timely

Number
200841016
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Section 442; Accounting Periods
Code sections
§ 442, § 6110
Ruling dated
July 2, 2008
Publicly released
October 10, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer intended to change its tax year from one ending March 31 to one ending December 31 but filed Form 1128 after its deadline. The form and request for discretionary relief arrived within 90 days after the due date. The IRS found that an error or misunderstanding caused the delay and that the taxpayer had otherwise acted diligently, reasonably, and in good faith. It also found that granting relief would not prejudice the government's interests. The IRS therefore treated the late Form 1128 as timely filed under Treasury Regulation Section 301.9100-3.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a late Form 1128 requesting a change in annual accounting period be treated as timely filed?
  • Outcome: Approved. The taxpayer received an extension of time under Treasury Regulation Section 301.9100-3.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 442; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.442-1(b), 301.9100-2, 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2006-45.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200841016
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/10/2008
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.09-00
--------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
---------------------------
CC:ITA:B5
------------------------------
PLR-106042-08
----------------------------------------
Date:

In Re: July 02, 2008
---------------------------
------------------------------
----------------------------------------

----------------------------

Dear ------------:

This is in reference to a Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change, or Retain a Tax Year, submitted on behalf of the above-named taxpayer, requesting permission to change its annual accounting period, for federal income tax purposes, from a taxable year ending March 31, to a taxable year ending December 31, effective for the tax year beginning April 1, 2006, and ending December 31, 2006. The taxpayer has requested that the Form 1128 be considered timely filed under the authority contained in
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

The taxpayer's Form 1128 requesting a change in accounting period to a tax year ending December 31, 2006, was due on or before September 15, 2007, but was not timely filed. However, the form and the request for discretionary administrative relief were filed within 90 days of such due date. The information furnished shows that the taxpayer intended to make the change and to file Form 1128 on a timely basis. Due to an error or misunderstanding, however, the form was not timely filed. The error was not due to any lack of due diligence or prompt action on the part of the taxpayer.

Section 1.442-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that in order to secure the Commissioner's consent to a change in annual accounting period, the taxpayer must file an application on Form 1128 with the Commissioner within such time and in such manner as is provided in administrative procedures published by the Commissioner. But for a timely filing, the taxpayer’s Form 1128 would be subject to the automatic consent procedures of Rev. Proc. 2006-45, 2006-45 I.R.B. 851, and due on or before the due date (including extensions) of the return of tax required for the short period (September 15, 2007).
PLR-106042-08
2

Section 301.9100-3(a) of the regulations provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions), such as the instant case, must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3. Requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, it is held that the taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief have been satisfied in this case, and taxpayer's late- filed Form 1128 requesting permission to change to a tax year ending December 31, effective for the tax year beginning April 1, 2006, is considered timely filed.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon facts and representations furnished by the taxpayer, and is limited to the filing of Form 1128. Except as specifically addressed herein, no opinion is expressed regarding the tax treatment of the subject transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable thereto. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the requested ruling; verification of factual information, representations, and other data is within the examination jurisdiction of the taxpayer's IRS Industry Director.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ George F. Wright

George F. Wright
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)

Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace