PLR 200839015: Correcting amounts paid does not revoke Section 83(b) elections

Number
200839015
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Revocability of Election
Code sections
§ 83, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 25, 2008
Publicly released
September 26, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A service provider received interests in three limited partnerships and timely made separate Section 83(b) elections. Following the partnerships' instructions, the taxpayer listed only an advance-funding fee as the amount paid for each interest. After the taxpayer paid for the interests, the partnerships explained that the elections understated the amounts paid. The IRS ruled that changing the elections to show the correct purchase amounts would be a correction rather than a revocation requiring the Commissioner's consent under Section 83(b)(2).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Do changes showing the correct amounts paid for partnership interests constitute revocations of timely Section 83(b) elections?
  • Outcome: Approved. The changes are corrections, not revocations.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 83(a), (b); Treas. Reg. § 1.83-2(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200839015
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/26/2008
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 83.02-04
------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------
CC:TEGE:EB:EC
----------
PLR-113946-08
----------------------------
Date:
In Re: June 25, 2008
----------------------------
------------------------------
----------
----------------------------

LEGEND:

Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = -----------------------
Date 3 = -----------------------
Date 4 = -----------------------
Date 5 --------------------------
Date 6 = -----------------------

Dear ----------------:

This letter is in response to a letter dated March 19, 2008, submitted by your authorized representative, requesting consent to correct three elections you made pursuant to section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The facts, as represented, are as follows.

On Date 1, you received interests as a limited partner in three limited partnerships as consideration for performance of services. You were required to submit payment for these interests to the partnerships by Date 2. The partnerships funded your interests in advance and charged a fee for the advance funding.

On Date 3, the partnerships provided instructions to you to make elections pursuant to section 83(b). Specifically, the partnerships instructed you to report the fee as the amount paid for each partnership interest. You followed these instructions when executing three separate elections pursuant to section 83(b) for each partnership interest. On Date 4, you timely filed the elections with the Internal Revenue Service.
PLR-113946-08
2

On Date 5, you submitted payment for the partnership interests and provided copies of the elections to the partnerships. On Date 6, the partnerships contacted you to inform you that you understated the amount paid for each partnership interest.

Section 83(a) of the Code provides that if, in connection with the performance of services, property is transferred to any person other than the person for whom such services are performed, the fair market value of the property (less the amount paid for the property) shall be included in the gross income of the recipient in the first taxable year in which the recipient's interest in the property is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Under section 83(b), any person who performs services with respect to which property is transferred may elect to include in his or her gross income, for the taxable year in which the property is transferred, the excess of the fair market value of the property over the amount paid. An election under section 83(b) must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service not later than 30 days after the date the property is transferred.

Section 83 of the Code and section 1.83-2(f) of the Income Tax Regulations provide that an election under section 83(b) may not be revoked without the consent of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The regulations also provide that such consent will only be granted where the person filing the election is under a "mistake of fact" as to the underlying transaction and must be requested within 60 days of the date on which the mistake of fact first became known to the person who made the election. In any event, neither a mistake as to the value (or decline in the value) of the property for which an election was made, nor the failure of anyone to perform an act that was contemplated at the time of “transfer" of the property constitute a "mistake of fact" for this purpose.

Based solely on the representations provided, and the information and documents submitted, we conclude that the proposed changes to your elections pursuant to section 83(b) with respect to the partnership interests are not revocations of your elections within the meaning of section 83(b)(2) of the Code, but rather corrections to your original elections to reflect the appropriate amounts paid for the partnership interests.

Except as specifically ruled above, no opinion is expressed as to the federal tax consequences of the transaction described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning other tax consequences of section 83 and its applicability to the transaction described above.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. The taxpayer should attach a copy of this ruling to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
PLR-113946-08
3

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Kenneth M. Griffin
Senior Technician Reviewer
Executive Compensation Branch
Office of Division Counsel /
Associate Chief Counsel /
Tax Exempt & Government Entities

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace