Determination 200837052: Inactive organization agreed to loss of its charitable exemption

Number
200837052
Outcome
Revocation
Document type
Determination Letter
IRS subject
Employee Benefit Organization (See Also 0501.09-00)
Code sections
§ 170, § 501, § 503, § 6104, § 7428
Ruling dated
May 22, 2008
Publicly released
September 12, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's determination, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS revoked a § 501(c)(3) organization’s exemption after the organization ceased operating and its officer confirmed that it would not resume its exempt activities. The examination report says the state had administratively dissolved the organization for not filing an annual report, and the organization could not complete a voluntary dissolution without first being reinstated. The final adverse letter also states that the organization conducted no charitable activities and transferred its assets to its founders’ business without receiving anything in return, although those asset-transfer facts do not appear in the enclosed examination report. The IRS concluded that the inactive organization no longer operated for an exempt purpose. The organization agreed to the revocation, which took effect from the redacted date on which it ceased operations.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the inactive organization continue to qualify for exemption under § 501(c)(3)?
  • Outcome: Revocation. The organization agreed that its exemption should end when it ceased operations.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 501(c)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1); Rev. Proc. 90-27; Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945)

Full text (IRS public release)

May 22, 2008
Number: 200837052
Release Date: 9/12/2008

UIL: 501.03-01

LEGEND

ORG = Organization name XX = Date Address = address

ORG Person to Contact:

ADDRESS Contact Telephone Number:
In Reply Refer to: TE/GE Review Staff
EIN:

LAST DATE FOR FILING A PETITION
WITH THE TAX COURT: August 20, 20XX

CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Dear

This is a Final Adverse Determination Letter as to your exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Your exemption from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the code is hereby revoked effective August 2, 20XX. You have agreed to this adverse determination, per signed Form 6018, on October 30, 20XX.

Our adverse determination was made for the following reasons:

Organizations described in I.R.C. section 501(c)(3) and exempt under section 501(a) must be organized and operated exclusively for an exempt purpose. Your organization did not engage in any charitable activities and your assets were transferred to the Founders’ business in a series of transactions and the organization received nothing from the transfer. Your organization is not a charitable organization within the meaning of Treasury Regulations section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d). You have not established that you have operated exclusively for an exempt purpose.

You failed to meet the requirements of IRC section 501(c)(3) and Treas. Reg. section 1.501 (c)(3) -1(d) in that you failed to establish that you were operated exclusively for an exempt purpose.

Contributions to your organization are no longer deductible under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code. You are required to file Federal income tax returns on Form 1120. These returns should be filed with the appropriate Service Center for the year ending August 1, 20XX, and for all years thereafter.

Processing of income tax returns and assessment of any taxes due will not be delayed should a petition for declaratory judgment be filed under section 7428 of the Internal Revenue Code.

If you decide to contest this determination in court, you must initiate a suit for declaratory judgment in the United States Tax Court, the United States Claim Court or the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia before the 91st day after the date this determination was mailed to you. Contact the clerk of the appropriate court for the rules for initiating suits for declaratory judgment.

You also have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. However, you should first contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown above since this person can access your tax information and can help you get answers. You can call and ask for Taxpayer Advocate assistance. Or you can contact the Taxpayer Advocate from the site where the tax deficiency was determined by calling: Or writing to: Internal Revenue Service, Office of Taxpayer Advocate.

Taxpayer Advocate assistance cannot be used as a substitute for established IRS procedures, formal appeals processes, etc. The Taxpayer Advocate is not able to reverse legal or technically correct tax determinations, nor extend the time fixed by law that you have to file a petition in the United States Tax Court. The Taxpayer Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter that may not have been resolved through normal channels gets prompt and proper handling.

We will notify the appropriate State Officials of this action, as required by section 6104(c) of the Internal Revenue Code.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely yours,

Marsha A. Ramirez
Director, EO Examinations

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
230 S Dearborn, 17th Floor MC4929CHI
Chicago, IL 60604.

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

September 27, 2007

Taxpayer Identification Number:

ORG
ADDRESS Form:

Tax Year(s) Ended:
Person to Contact/ID Number:

Contact Numbers:
Telephone:
Fax:

Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested

Dear ,

We have enclosed a copy of our report of examination explaining why we believe revocation of your exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) is necessary.

If you accept our findings, take no further action. We will issue a final revocation letter.

If you do not agree with our proposed revocation, you must submit to us a written request for Appeals Office consideration within 30 days from the date of this letter to protest our decision. Your protest should include a statement of the facts, the applicable law, and arguments in support of your position.

An Appeals officer will review your case. The Appeals office is independent of the Director, EO Examinations. The Appeals Office resolves most disputes informally and promptly. The enclosed Publication 3498, The Examination Process, and Publication 892, Exempt Organizations Appeal Procedures for Unagreed Issues, explain how to appeal an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) decision. Publication 3498 also includes information on your rights as a taxpayer and the IRS collection process.

You may also request that we refer this matter for technical advice as explained in Publication 892. If we issue a determination letter to you based on technical advice, no further administrative appeal is available to you within the IRS regarding the issue that was the subject of the technical advice.

Letter 3618 (04-2002)
Catalog Number 34809F

If we do not hear from you within 30 days from the date of this letter, we will process your case based on the recommendations shown in the report of examination. If you do not protest this proposed determination within 30 days from the date of this letter, the IRS will consider it to be a failure to exhaust your available administrative remedies. Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code provides, in part: "A declaratory judgment or decree under this section shall not be issued in any proceeding unless the Tax Court, the Claims Court, or the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia determines that the organization involved has exhausted its administrative remedies within the Internal Revenue Service.” We will then issue a final revocation letter. We will also notify the appropriate state officials of the revocation in accordance with section 6104(c) of the Code.

You have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate assistance is not a substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer Advocate cannot reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend the time fixed by law that you have to file a petition in a United States court. The Taxpayer Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter that may not have been resolved through normal channels gets prompt and proper handling. You may call toll-free 1-877-777-4778 and ask for Taxpayer Advocate Assistance. If you prefer, you may contact your local Taxpayer Advocate at:

If you have any questions, please call the contact person at the telephone number shown in the heading of this letter. If you write, please provide a telephone number and the most convenient time to call if we need to contact you.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Marsha A. Ramirez
Director, EO Examinations

Enclosures:
Publication 892
Publication 3498
Report of Examination

Letter 3618 (04-2002)
Catalog Number 34809F

Form 886A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or Exhibit Explanation of Items Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended ORG 20XX12

LEGEND
ORG = Organization name XX = Date Motto = motto

ISSUE #1

Whether ORG exemption under Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3), should be revoked due to inactive status?

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF FACTS

ORG was created to educate the public on the issue of motto, and provide help & assistance to victims of motto. The organization received exempt status on August 27, 20XX with the advance ruling period beginning on March 11, 20XX and ending on December 31, 20XX.

The organization ceased operation in August 20XX. They did not file “Articles of Dissolution with the state. The state of administratively dissolved the organization on August 02, 20XX due to non-filling of annual report. The officer made an effort to file the articles of dissolution with the state, but was not successful because State of requires that the corporation be re-activated before they can apply for dissolution.

The officer confirmed that they are no longer interested in carrying out the exempt activities of the organization, and therefore, the corporation status will not be reinstated.

LAW

Section 501 of the Code provides for the exemption from federal income tax of corporations organized and operated exclusively for charitable or educational purposes, provided that no part of the net earnings of such corporations inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. See § 501(c)(3).

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an organization operates exclusively for exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities that accomplish exempt purposes specified in § 501(c)(3). An organization will not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose. An organization must not engage in substantial activities that fail to further an exempt purpose. In Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C. v. U.S., 326 U.S. 279, 283 (1945), the Supreme Court held that the “presence of a single . . . [nonexempt] purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly . . . [exempt] purposes.”

Revenue Procedure 90-27, 1990-1 CB 514: A ruling or determination letter recognizing exemption may be revoked or modified by (1) a notice to the taxpayer to whom the ruling or determination letter originally was issued, (2) enactment of legislation or ratification of a tax treaty, (3) a decision of the United States Supreme Court, (4) issuance of temporary or final regulations, or (5) issuance of a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, or other statement

Form 886A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or Exhibit Explanation of Items

Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX12

published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The revocation or modification may be retroactive if the organization omitted or misstated a material fact, operated in a manner materially different from that originally represented, or, in the case of organizations to which section 503 applies, engaged in a prohibited transaction with the purpose of diverting corpus or income of the organization from its exempt purpose and such transaction involved a substantial part of the corpus or income of such organization. Where there is a material change, inconsistent with exemption, in the character, the purpose, or the method of operation of an organization, revocation or modification will ordinarily take effect as of the date of such material change.

GOVERNMENT’S POSITION

ORG was organized in accordance with IRC 501(c)(3) code, but they are not operating in accordance with the sub-section. The exempt organization is no longer carrying out an exempt purpose, and does not have an exempt function. If an organization is inactive, it does not have a 501(c)(3) purpose and thus cannot operate as an exempt organization. Therefore, since all evidences clearly indicate that the organization will not resume operating for exempt purpose, it is proposed that the exempt status be revoked.

CONCLUSION

In order to qualify for exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3) an organization must be both organized and operated to achieve a purpose that is described under that Code section. The organization is not operational and do not have an exemption function, therefore, revocation is proposed effective from when the organization ceased operation; August 02, 20XX.

TAXPAYER’S POSITION:

Taxpayer agreed with the conclusion.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace