CCA 200835032: Prior ethanol-plant depreciation advice should not be followed
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An earlier Chief Counsel Advice had classified assets in an integrated corn-to-bioethanol facility under Asset Class 49.5 for depreciation. After further consideration, the IRS and Treasury decided the issue should be handled through published guidance. Chief Counsel therefore instructed that the earlier advice, CCA 200814025, should not be followed when determining depreciation deductions. This memorandum did not provide a replacement asset classification.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should taxpayers follow the earlier Chief Counsel classification of integrated ethanol-plant assets?
- Outcome: Advice given, CCA 200814025 should not be followed
- Key authorities: IRC § 168; Rev. Proc. 87-56
Full text (IRS public release)
Office of Chief Counsel
Internal Revenue Service
Memorandum
Number: 200835032
Release Date: 8/29/2008
CC:ITA:B07:JPHuffman
Third Party Communication: None
PRESP-105045-08
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
UILC: 168.20-00
date: August 27, 2008
to: Deputy Area Counsel (Industry Programs) LMSB Area 3, Retail, Food, Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare
from: Branch Chief, Branch 7, CC:ITA:7 (Income Tax & Accounting)
subject: Chief Counsel Advice on Ethanol Plant Depreciation
On December 14, 2007, the office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting) issued Chief Counsel Advice (CCA 200814025) addressing the appropriate depreciation classification of assets used in an integrated facility for converting corn (a biomass) to bioethanol (a liquid fuel). Our advice concluded that the appropriate depreciation classification of these assets under Rev. Proc. 87-56 (1987-2 C.B. 674) is Asset Class 49.5, Waste Reduction and Resource Recovery Plants. Upon further consideration, the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Treasury think that this issue is better addressed through the published guidance process. Accordingly, CCA 200814025 is not to be followed for determining appropriate tax depreciation deductions.
Please call (202) 622-4930 if you have any further questions.
GEORGE BLAINE
Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
Kathleen Reed
By: _____
Kathleen Reed
Branch Chief, Branch 7
(Income Tax & Accounting)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace