PLR 200832026: IRA withdrawal for lot purchase gets no late rollover waiver
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer withdrew money from his IRA to buy a trailer park lot, intending to put the same amount back within 60 days. He attempted to redeposit it two days after the deadline and requested a waiver, saying his wife's medical condition had preoccupied him. The IRS denied the waiver because the withdrawal functioned as a short-term loan and the taxpayer did not provide evidence showing that the medical condition prevented a timely redeposit. As a result, the distribution did not qualify as an IRA rollover contribution. This ruling shows how the IRS applied the equitable waiver factors to the taxpayer's use of the funds and the evidence he supplied.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Would the IRS waive the 60-day deadline for redepositing an IRA withdrawal?
- Outcome: Denied; the taxpayer did not establish grounds for a waiver.
- Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.
Full text (IRS public release)
200832026
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
MAY 15 2008
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
T:EP:RA:T:1
Control Number:
Legend:
Taxpayer =
IRA A =
Financial Institution B =
Amount 1 =
Dear
This letter is in response to a request for a letter ruling dated April 23, 2007, as supplemented by additional correspondence dated August 16, 2007, in which you have applied for a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code"), regarding the distribution of Amount 1 from your individual retirement account (IRA A) maintained with Financial Institution B.
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested:
Taxpayer represents that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by Code section 408(d)(3) was due to his wife’s medical condition which
preoccupied him.
Taxpayer maintained IRA A, an individual retirement account under section 408(a) of the Code. Taxpayer represents that on February 12, 2007, he prepared a check for Amount 1
200832026
which was payable from funds in IRA A. Amount 1, distributed on February 16, 2007, was used to purchase a trailer park lot and was not deposited in any other account maintained by Taxpayer with a financial institution. It was not intended to be rolled over to another IRA. While Taxpayer had other investment vehicles which could have been used for this purchase, IRA A was selected as a source of funds because it was the only readily liquid account totaling at least Amount 1 against which Taxpayer could write checks. Since Taxpayer intended to redeposit this same amount in IRA A within the 60- day rollover period of section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code, it was used as a short-term loan. On April 19, 2007, when Taxpayer and his wife attempted to redeposit Amount 1 in IRA A, they were advised by an employee of Financial Institution B that the 60-day rollover period had expired on April 17, 2007, two days earlier.
Based on the above facts and representations, you request that the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in Code section 408(d)(3) with respect to the distribution of Amount 1.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if -
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).
200832026
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
Taxpayer has not presented any evidence to the Service as to how any of the factors outlined in Rev. Proc. 2003-16 prevented him from completing the rollover during the 60-day rollover period of section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code. In this case, Taxpayer never intended to roll over Amount 1 to another IRA, but, instead, used it to purchase a trailer park lot. Thus, the withdrawal of Amount 1 was in the nature of a short-term loan. The information presented and the documentation submitted by Taxpayer do not substantiate his assertion that his inability to timely redeposit Amount 1 in IRA A was due to his wife’s medical condition requiring his full time and attention during the 60-day rollover period.
Therefore, pursuant to Code section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service hereby does not waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA A. Taxpayer is not granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this letter ruling to contribute Amount 1 into IRA A or another IRA. Since the requirements for a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement under section 408(d)(3)(I) are not met, Amount 1 will not be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3).
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
200832026
4
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact [illegible], SE:T:EP:RA:T1, (I.D.
[illegible]), at [illegible].
Sincerely yours,
Carlton A. Watkins
Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of this Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose, Notice 437
200832026
4
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact [illegible], SE:T:EP:RA:T1, (I.D.
[illegible]), at [illegible].
Sincerely yours,
Carlton A. Watkins
Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of this Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose, Notice 437
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace