PLR 200827015: Cemetery transfer leaves care trust intact but may trigger built-in gain tax

Number
200827015
Outcome
Mixed outcome
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Perpetual Care Funds
Code sections
§ 61, § 501, § 642, § 651, § 661, § 662, § 1374, § 6110
Ruling dated
April 9, 2008
Publicly released
July 4, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxable cemetery company planned to transfer its nearly full cemetery to a new tax exempt cemetery company and resign as trustee of its perpetual care trust. The IRS concluded that the property transfer would neither distribute or terminate the trust nor cause income, gain, or loss attributable to the trust to be recognized by it, the company, or its beneficiaries. The reason was that the taxable company was not a beneficiary of the trust, and the trust's grantor and beneficiaries' interests would remain unchanged. The IRS warned that any recognized built-in gain on the cemetery property could be subject to § 1374 because the transferor had elected S corporation status while owning the property. It did not rule on other tax effects of the property transfer.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What happens to the perpetual care trust and potential built-in gain when the cemetery property moves to an exempt company?
  • Outcome: Mixed; no trust-level realization from the transfer, but § 1374 applies to any recognized built-in gain.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 642(i), 661, 1374(d)(3).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200827015
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/4/2008
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 642.09-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------
-------------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------
---------------------
--------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B1
PLR-137710-07
Date:
April 09, 2008

LEGEND:

X = ----------------------------------------
------------------------

Trust = -------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------

Date 1 = --------------------------

Date 2 = -----------------

Date 3 = ----------------

Year 1 = ---------

Dear -----------------

This letter responds to a letter dated August 15, 2007, submitted on behalf of X, requesting rulings related to the proposed transfer of X’s property to an entity exempt from tax.

Facts

X represents that X is a corporation that was formed on Date 1 under the laws of State. X is engaged in the business of providing burial services to the public on a parcel of real property owned by X. X also owns certain buildings and equipment located on the parcel that are used in the provision of the burial services (the parcel, buildings, and equipment are hereafter referred to as the “Cemetery Property”). X also represents that

PLR-137710-07
2

the Cemetery Property is approaching its burial capacity. As such, X no longer markets burial lots to the public.

Trust is a trust that was formed by X on Date 2. X is the trustee of Trust. Trust was created to ensure sufficient funding for the maintenance and upkeep of the Cemetery Property. Since the inception of Trust, X has periodically deposited certain sums with Trust, typically as plots were sold to the public. Throughout the years, Trust has distributed the amounts necessary to maintain the Cemetery Property to X. Amounts not distributed by Trust have been invested by Trust in a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, and other securities.

X represents that it has treated Trust as a separate trust since its formation; that all amounts deposited with Trust have been segregated from the other assets of X; that distributions made from Trust to X have been solely used to defray (1) expenses incurred in connection with the care and maintenance of the Cemetery Property, and (2) administrative expenses directly related to Trust, including investment management fees, taxes, and attorney fees; that since Year 1 Trust has filed 1041 Trust tax returns and that such returns have reflected the gains and losses attributable to the Trust; and that at no time since the formation of Trust has X included gains and losses from the Trust on its corporate income tax returns.

Recently X decided to divest itself from its burial services operations. To accomplish this, X proposes to transfer the Cemetery Property to a newly formed entity that will be exempt from tax under section 501(c)(13) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Exempt Cemetery Company”) (the transfer described above is hereafter referred to as the “Proposed Transfer”). The Exempt Cemetery Company will assume responsibility for maintaining the Cemetery Property and will not transfer any money or other consideration to X as part of the Proposed Transfer. Immediately following the Proposed Transfer, X will resign as trustee of Trust and an independent trustee will be appointed.

Effective Date 3, X made an election to be an S corporation.

Law and Analysis

Section 651 provides that in the case of any trust the terms of which provide that all of its income is required to be distributed currently, and do not provide that any amounts are to be paid, permanently set aside, or used for the purposes specified in § 642(c), there shall be allowed as a deduction in computing the taxable income of the trust the amount of the income for the taxable year which is required to be distributed currently.

Section 661(a) provides that in any taxable year a deduction is allowed in computing the taxable income of a trust (other than a trust to which subpart B applies),

PLR-137710-07
3

for the sum of (1) the amount of income for such taxable year required to be distributed currently, and (2) any other amounts properly paid or credited or required to be distributed for such taxable year, but such deduction shall not exceed the distributable net income (DNI) of the estate or trust.

Section 1.661(a)-2(f) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that gain or loss is realized by the trust or estate (or the other beneficiaries) by reason of a distribution of property in kind if the distribution is in satisfaction of a right to receive a distribution of a specific dollar amount, of specific property other than that distributed, or of income as defined under § 643(b) and the applicable regulations, if income is required to be distributed currently.

Section 662(a) provides that there shall be included in the gross income of a beneficiary to whom an amount specified in § 661(a) is paid, credited, or required to be distributed (by an estate or trust described in § 661), the sum of the following amounts: (1) the amount of income for the taxable year required to be distributed currently to such beneficiary, whether distributed or not; and (2) all other amounts properly paid, credited, or required to be distributed to such beneficiary for the taxable year.

Section 642(i) provides, in general, that when the specific requirements of the section are met, a cemetery perpetual care fund shall treat certain amounts distributed for the care and maintenance of gravesites as distributions solely for purposes of §§ 651 and 661. With respect to the enactment of § 642(i), the Senate Finance Committee report states that "since the taxable cemetery company is not the beneficiary of the perpetual care trust fund, the bill does not change the treatment of the receipt of such amounts by the taxable cemetery company. Consequently, such an amount is to continue to be taxable to the cemetery company as ordinary income (sec. 61) and is not to be treated as a trust distribution in the hands of the cemetery company (secs. 652 and 662)." S.Rep. No. 1317, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 3 (1976); 1976-2 C.B. 553, 554.

In Metairie Cemetery Association v. United States, 282 F.2d 225 (5th Cir.1960), the court held that a cemetery corporation was not a beneficiary of a cemetery perpetual care trust, and that interest income distributed to the corporation by the trust for the maintenance of cemetery grounds is treated as compensation for services in the hands of the corporation.

Under the Trust documents and the authorities described above, X is not a beneficiary of Trust. Trust will continue to have the same grantor and the interests of the Trust beneficiaries will not differ compared to their interests before the Proposed Transfer. Therefore, the Proposed Transfer will not result in a distribution from, or termination of, Trust under § 661, and will not result in the realization by Trust, X, or any beneficiary of Trust of any income, gain, or loss attributable to Trust.

PLR-137710-07
4

X elected to be an S corporation effective Date 3, at which time it owned the Cemetery Property. Thus, to the extent the Proposed Transfer results in recognized built-in gain under § 1374(d)(3) attributable to the Cemetery Property, the provisions of § 1374 and the regulations thereunder shall apply.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed on any other tax consequences arising from the transfer of the Cemetery Property to the Exempt Cemetery Company.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Audrey W. Ellis

Audrey W. Ellis
Senior Counsel, Branch 1
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace