PLR 200822007: IRS declines to undo research credit method election

Number
200822007
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Credit for Increasing Research Activities
Code sections
§ 41, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 28, 2008
Publicly released
May 30, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company elected the alternative incremental research credit method for a tax year after acquiring another company. Its successor later concluded that a calculation using the regular research credit method and the acquired company's earlier figures would have yielded a larger credit. It asked the IRS to let it revoke the earlier election for that tax year. The IRS declined. The letter notes that an election under § 41(c)(4) applies to the elected year and succeeding years unless the IRS consents to revocation. The IRS did not give a further explanation for denying consent.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company revoke its alternative incremental research credit election for the earlier tax year?
  • Outcome: Denied: the IRS did not grant permission to revoke the election.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 41(c)(4)(B).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200822007
Release Date: 5/30/2008
Index Number: 41.00-00

------------------------------------------------------------ Person To Contact:
-------
-------------------, ID No. ------------
------------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
-------
--------------------
----------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------
CC:PSI:5
---------------------------------------------------------- PLR-134352-07

Date: February 28, 2008

LEGEND

Company F = -------------------------------
----------------------------------
---------------------------------------
-----------------------

Company G = -----------------------------------

Company H = -------------------------------------
----------------------

Year X = ------

Year Y = ---------

Year Z = ------

PLR-134352-07
2

Dear --------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated July 26, 2007, and subsequent correspondence, submitted by Company H and its authorized representatives requesting permission to revoke Company F’s election to use the alternative incremental research credit (AIRC) under § 41(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code for the Year X taxable year.

In Year X, Company F was a calendar year taxpayer that used the accrual method of accounting. For tax years prior to Year X, Company F had calculated the § 41 research credit using the regular method under § 41(a) and the § 41(c)(3)(B) rules for start-up companies to determine the fixed-base percentage. During Year X, Company F acquired Company G. For purposes of filing the combined Company F and Company G return for Year X, Company F determined, taking into account Company F’s acquisition of Company G, that the AIRC method under § 41(c)(4) would be more beneficial to Company F than the method used in years prior to Year X to claim the § 41 research credit. Accordingly, Company F attached a Form 6765, Credit for Increasing Research Expenses, to its Year X return, electing to use the AIRC method to claim § 41 research credits.

In Year Y, following a successful hostile takeover bid, Company H acquired a controlling interest in Company F. In Year Z, Company F merged with and into Company H, with Company H continuing as the surviving company. Sometime after Year Y, an officer for Company H determined that had Company F calculated the § 41 research credit for Year X using the regular fixed-based percentage rules under § 41(c)(3)(A) and Company G’s base-period qualified research expenditures and gross receipts rather than the § 41(c)(3)(B) rules for start-up companies, more research credit would have been available to include on Company F’s return for Year X than the amount calculated using the AIRC method.

Company F, through its successor in interest Company H, has requested permission to revoke its election to use the § 41(c)(4) AIRC method for the Year X taxable year.

For taxable years beginning after June 30, 1996, taxpayers may elect to determine their research credit under the AIRC rules of § 41(c)(4). Section 41(c)(4)(B) provides that an election under § 41(c)(4)(A) applies to the taxable year for which it is made and all succeeding taxable years unless revoked with the consent of the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we decline to grant permission to Company F to revoke its election to determine its research credit under the AIRC rules of § 41(c)(4) for qualified research expenses paid or incurred during Company F’s Year X taxable year.

PLR-134352-07
3

Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

/s/
Christopher J. Wilson
Senior Counsel, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special
Industries)

Enclosures (2): Copy of this letter Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace