PLR 200817065: Pension funding waiver condition changed to match contribution date

Number
200817065
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 1, 2008
Publicly released
April 25, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company asked the IRS to modify a condition in an earlier waiver of its pension plan's minimum funding standard. The IRS approved replacing the condition with a requirement to contribute the missed quarterly payment, plus applicable interest, by September 24, 2007. It said the change made the condition consistent with the actual contribution date. The letter also warned that benefit increases or new retirement plans covering the same employees could have consequences while the waived funding deficiency remained unamortized.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company revise a condition of its earlier minimum funding waiver to reflect the contribution date?
  • Outcome: Approved; condition (2) was replaced with the stated contribution requirement.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 412(f); ERISA § 304(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

200817065
FEB 01 2008

Re:
Company =

Dear

This letter constitutes notice that the Company's request for a modification of the conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard for the Plan for the plan year ending December 31, , that was granted in a ruling letter dated August 23, 2007, has been approved. Accordingly, condition (2) of the funding waiver is replaced with the following condition:

(2) On or before September 24, 2007, the Company makes a contribution to the Plan in an amount equal to the missed required quarterly payment due April 15, , for the plan year ending December 31, (adjusted with applicable interest to the actual date of the contribution).

This modification is being made so that the condition is consistent with the actual date of the contribution to the Plan.

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA which describe the consequences that would result in the event the Plan is amended to increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized. Please note that any amendment to a profit sharing plan or any other retirement plans (covering employees covered by the Plan) maintained by the Company, to increase the liabilities of those plans would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA. Similarly, the establishment of a new profit sharing plan or any other retirement plan by the Company (covering employees covered by the Plan) would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA.

200817065

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the [illegible], to the [illegible], and to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office. We suggest that you furnish a copy of this letter to the enrolled actuary who is responsible for the completion of the Schedule B of Form 5500 for the Plan.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact [illegible].

Sincerely yours,

Michael D. Julianelle
Director, Employee Plans

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace