PLR 200817034: Inadvertent preferred stock issue gets S corporation relief

Number
200817034
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Election by Small Business Corporation
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 1366, § 1367, § 1368
Ruling dated
January 25, 2008
Publicly released
April 25, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation issued preferred stock with distribution rights different from its common stock. That created a second class of stock and terminated both its S election and its subsidiary's QSub election. After discovering the problem, the company exchanged the preferred shares for common shares and removed the preferred stock from its charter. The IRS found the terminations inadvertent and ruled that both elections would be treated as continuing from the termination date, provided the companies remained otherwise eligible. The company and its shareholders must report and adjust their taxes consistently with S corporation treatment.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation and its subsidiary retain their S corporation and QSub status after an inadvertent second class of stock was corrected?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to continued eligibility and consistent tax adjustments.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b), 1362(f), 1366–1368; Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(l).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200817034
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/25/2008
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.00-00, 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------
-----------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------
---------------------
-----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-157944-06
Date:
January 25, 2008

Legend

X = ----------------------------------
-----------------------

Y = ----------------------------
-----------------------

A = ---------------------
-------------------------

B = -----------------------
-------------------------

C = ---------------------------------
-------------------------

State = ----------

D1 = --------------------------

D2 = ----------------------

D3 = -------------------------

D4 = --------------------

D5 = ---------------------------

D6 = --------------------------

PLR-157944-06
2

D7 = ----------------

D8 = -------------

D9 = --------------------

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated December 13, 2006, and subsequent correspondence, written on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Facts

The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State on D1. X elected to be an S corporation effective D2. On D3, X purchased all of the stock of Y and elected to treat Y as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) effective D3.

Under X’s Articles of Incorporation, X was authorized to issue common stock. As of D2, X’s common stock was held by A, B, and C. On D4, X's Articles of Incorporation were amended to authorize the issuance of preferred stock, which provided for preferential distribution rights over the common stock. X issued shares of preferred stock to A on D5, D6, and D7 in exchange for A’s contribution of money to X.

Around D8, X’s Board of Directors discovered that X may have inadvertently terminated its S corporation election on D5 by issuing a second class of stock. On D9, X took corrective action by issuing additional shares of common stock to A in exchange for, and upon cancellation of, the preferred stock, and by amending X’s Articles of Incorporation to eliminate the preferred stock.

X represents that no distributions of cash or other property have ever been made by X with respect to the preferred stock. X further represents that X and its shareholders did not intend to create more than one class of stock, and, as soon as X’s Board of Directors realized the potential problem caused by the preferred stock, X eliminated the preferred stock. X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments, consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation, as might be required by the Secretary.

PLR-157944-06
3

Law and Analysis

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to any tax year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for the year.

Section 1361(b)(1) provides that the term "small business corporation" means a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.

Section 1.1361-1(l)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that except as provided in § 1.1361-1(l)(4) (relating to instruments, obligations, or arrangements treated as a second class of stock), a corporation is treated as having only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock of the corporation confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds.

Section 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) provides, in part, that in general, the determination of whether all outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws, applicable state law, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation proceeds (collectively, the governing provisions).

Section 1361(b)(3)(B) provides that the term "qualified subchapter S subsidiary" means any domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation (as defined in § 1361(b)(2)), if 100 percent of the stock of the corporation is held by the S corporation, and the S corporation elects to treat the corporation as a QSub.

Section 1362(a)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a small business corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be an S corporation.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) will be terminated whenever (at anytime on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) or § 1361(b)(3)(B)(ii) by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or § 1361(b)(3)(C), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after

PLR-157944-06
4

discovery of the circumstances resulting in such termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred is a small business corporation or a QSub, as the case may be, and (4) the corporation for which the termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of such corporation as an S corporation or a QSub, as the case may be) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such termination, such corporation shall be treated as an S corporation or a QSub, as the case may be, during the period specified by the Secretary.

Conclusion

Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the issuance of the preferred stock was a second class of stock that terminated X’s S corporation election and Y’s QSub election on D5. We also conclude that the termination of X's S corporation election and Y’s QSub election was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f).

Under the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from D5 and thereafter, provided X's S corporation election is otherwise valid and is not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d). In addition, Y will be treated as a QSub of X from D5 and thereafter, provided that Y satisfies the requirements to be a QSub under § 1361(b)(3)(B) and that X's S corporation election is not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

This ruling is contingent on X and its shareholders treating X as an S corporation for the period beginning D5 and thereafter, and on X treating Y as a QSub for the period beginning D5 and thereafter. X and its shareholders must make any adjustments that are necessary to comply with this ruling. Accordingly, the shareholders of X must include their pro rata shares of the separately and nonseparately computed items of X in their income as provided in § 1366, make adjustments to stock basis as provided in § 1367, and take into account any distributions made by X as provided in § 1368.

Except as specifically set forth above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding whether X is otherwise eligible to be an S corporation, or whether Y is otherwise eligible to be a QSub.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-157944-06
5

In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to X's authorized representative.

Sincerely,

/s/

Tara P. Volungis
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace