PLR 200809016: Parent gets time to file statement about subsidiary stock loss

Number
200809016
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Regulation Section 1.337(d); Loss on Stock of Subsidiary; Allowable Worthless Stock Loss
Code sections
§ 337, § 6501
Ruling dated
November 26, 2007
Publicly released
February 29, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporate parent said its stock in a subsidiary became worthless, but it failed to include a required statement with its consolidated return to seek recognition of the loss. The parent submitted affidavits explaining that it had relied on a qualified tax professional who did not make or recommend the election. The IRS granted 60 days to file the statement after finding reasonable conduct, good faith, and no prejudice to the government. The extension was conditioned on the group's aggregate tax liability not being lower than if it had filed on time. The IRS did not decide whether the stock actually became worthless or what loss, if any, was allowable.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent file its section 1.337(d)-2T(c) loss statement after the deadline?
  • Outcome: Yes, within 60 days and subject to the tax liability condition.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.337(d)-2T(c), 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200809016
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/29/2008
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 9100.29-00, 337.16-02
Person To Contact:
------------------
--------------------, ID No. -------------
----------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------
--------------------
---------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------
CC:CORP:B04
PLR-139216-07
Date:
November 26, 2007

Legend

Parent = ---------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Sub = -------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

State A = -------------

Date 1 = -------------

Date 2 = --------------------------

Date 3 = ---------------------------

Company Official = -------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tax Professional = --------------------
----------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear ------------:

PLR-139216-07
2

This letter responds to a letter dated August 30, 2007, submitted on behalf of Parent, requesting an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election. Additional information was submitted in letters dated September 14, 2007 and November 5, 2007. The extension is being requested in order to allow Parent to file a “§ 1.337(d)-2T(c) statement” under § 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations (the “Election”) to recognize some or all of a loss upon the disposition of stock of a subsidiary. The Election was required to be filed with Parent’s consolidated Federal income tax return for the taxable year ended Date 2, which was filed on Date 3. The material information submitted for consideration is summarized below.

Parent, a State A corporation, is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations filing a consolidated Federal income tax return on a calendar year basis. Sub was included on Parent’s consolidated return for the taxable year ended Date 2. On Date 1 (which is in the taxable year ended Date 2), Parent’s investment in Sub became entirely worthless.

An election under § 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3) to recognize some or all of a loss upon the disposition of the stock of a subsidiary was required to be filed with or as part of Parent’s income tax return for the year of its disposition. However, for various reasons, the Election was not filed. Subsequently, this request was submitted, under § 301.9100-3, for an extension of time to file a valid election. The period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code has not expired for the taxable year for which the Election should have been field or for any subsequent taxable year.

Section 1.337(d)-2T(a)(1) provides that no deduction is allowed for any loss recognized by a member of a consolidated group with respect to the disposition of stock of a subsidiary.

Section 1.337(d)-2T(a)(2) provides that a disposition means any event in which gain or loss is recognized in whole or in part.

Section 1.337(d)-2T(c)(1) provides that § 1.337(d)-2T(c) applies with respect to stock of a subsidiary only if a separate statement entitled “§ 1.337(d)-2T(c) statement” is included with the return in accordance with § 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3).

Section 1.337(d)-2T(c)(2) provides that loss is not disallowed under § 1.337(d)- 2T(a)(1) to the extent the taxpayer establishes that the loss is not attributable to the recognition of built-in gain on the disposition of an asset (including stock and securities).

Section 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3) provides that the statement required under § 1.337(d)- 2T(c)(1) must be included with or as part of the taxpayer's return for the year of the disposition.

PLR-139216-07
3

In general, § 1.337(d)-2T applies with respect to dispositions and deconsolidations after March 6, 2002 and before March 3, 2005. If loss is recognized because stock of a subsidiary becomes worthless, the disposition with respect to the stock is treated as occurring on the date the stock became worthless. Section 1.337(d)- 2T(g).

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section § 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when it is established that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., § 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Parent to file the Election, provided Parent establishes that it acted reasonably and in good faith, that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent, Company Official, and Tax Professional explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file the Election. The information establishes that Parent reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise Parent to make, the Election, and that the Government will not be prejudiced if relief is granted. See § 301.9100- 3(b)(1)(v).

Based on the facts and information submitted, including the affidavits submitted and the representations that have been made, we conclude that Parent has shown that it acted reasonably and in good faith in failing to timely file the Election, that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government. Accordingly, an extension of time is

PLR-139216-07
4

granted under § 301.9100-3, until 60 days from the date on this letter, for Parent to file the Election.

The Election statement should be entitled “§ 1.337(d)-2T(c) STATEMENT” and must include all the material specified by § 1.337(d)-2T(c)(3).

The Election is to be filed with the Director who has jurisdiction over Parent’s return within the time period specified above.

The above extension of time is conditioned on Parent's consolidated group's tax liability, if any, being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had been made timely (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to Parent's consolidated group's tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the Director's office upon audit of the Federal income tax returns involved. Further, no opinion is expressed as to the Federal income tax effect, if any, if it is determined that the taxpayers' tax liability is lower. Section 301.9100-3(c).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In particular, we express no opinion as to whether or when Sub’s stock did become worthless. In addition, we express no opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other section of the Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, filing the return or the Election late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling.

For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3, we relied on certain information and affidavits provided by Parent, Company Official, and Tax Professional under penalties of perjury. However, the Director should verify all essential facts. Moreover, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the Election, any penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable still apply.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

PLR-139216-07
5

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

_Ken Cohen_______
Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace