PLR 200805014: Taxpayer gets 45 days to file an election for an omitted foreign branch loss

Number
200805014
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
November 1, 2007
Publicly released
February 1, 2008

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2008, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2008
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer asked the IRS to supplement an earlier ruling after discovering that a foreign branch with a dual consolidated loss had been omitted from that ruling and its schedule. The IRS added the branch and its loss to the earlier ruling. It gave the taxpayer 45 days from this supplemental letter to file the required election and agreement for the branch's loss. The IRS also said this type of foreign branch did not have to file annual certifications for that loss, so an extension to file those certifications was unnecessary.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the earlier ruling cover the omitted foreign branch and allow a late election for its dual consolidated loss?
  • Outcome: Approved; the taxpayer received 45 days to file the election and agreement.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(C).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200805014
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/1/2008
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
9100.22-00, 1503.04-04
Person To Contact:
------------------------
----------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------
---------------------
----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------
CC:INTL
-------------
PLR-134361-07
--------------------------------
Date:
November 01, 2007

Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

Entity N = ---------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

Country N = --------------

Dear ---------------------:

This letter supplements letter ruling PLR-148632-03 issued to the Taxpayer on September 28, 2006, that was supplemented by letter ruling PLR-152568-06 dated March 27, 2007. Taxpayer submitted additional information on June 18, 2007, relating to the filings at issue in that ruling request.

In view of this additional information and representations, the previous letter ruling is amended as follows:

  1. The legend of the ruling letter is amended by adding Entity N.

  2. The legend of the ruling letter is amended by adding Country N.
    PLR-134361-07 2

  3. Entity N incurred a dual consolidated loss in Tax Year Z. Entity N was omitted from
    paragraph 4 of the letter ruling and from Schedule A, which was attached to and made part of the letter ruling, and, therefore, paragraph 4 of the letter ruling and Schedule A are amended to include Entity N for Tax Year Z.

Item 4 below is a paragraph added to the facts of the letter ruling, following the sixth paragraph (as added by the first supplemental letter):

  1. Entity N is disregarded as an entity separate from the Taxpayer and is a hybrid entity
    separate unit as described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(c)(4). Entity N conducts integral business operations outside the United States in Country N. Thus, this business activity constitutes a foreign branch within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-6T(g) and is hereinafter referred to as Foreign Branch N. Foreign Branch N is a separate unit described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(c)(3)(i)(A). This foreign branch separate unit incurred a dual consolidated loss in the tax year indicated on Schedule A that was attached to the letter ruling. However, the election and agreement required by Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to this dual consolidated loss was not filed with the consolidated U.S. income tax return for Tax Year Z.

Because the amendments made to the previous ruling letter by this supplemental ruling letter, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 45 days from the date of this supplemental ruling letter to file the election and agreement described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) in accordance with Schedule A attached to the letter ruling, including the election and agreement with respect to Entity N for Tax Year Z.

Pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(C), Taxpayer is not required to file annual certifications under Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) with respect to the dual consolidated losses of Foreign Branch N, because this foreign branch is a separate unit described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(c)(3)(i)(A). As a result, an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9901-3 to file annual certifications is inapplicable in this situation.

Sincerely,

_______
Associate Chief Counsel (International)

By:
Thomas Beem
Senior Technical Reviewer, CC:INTL;BR4
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace