PLR 200751029: Pension plan denied more time to amortize unfunded liabilities

Number
200751029
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Standards
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
September 28, 2007
Publicly released
December 21, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A multiemployer pension plan for workers primarily in the movie theater industry asked for more years to amortize its unfunded liabilities. The plan cited an aging membership, industry decline, and a gap between costs and employer contributions. The IRS denied the extension because projections reflecting the Pension Protection Act of 2006 showed no funding deficiency until 2017. On that record, the IRS concluded the extension would not serve ERISA's purposes and that denial would not threaten the plan's continuation, substantially cut benefits or compensation, or harm participants overall.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the plan receive a longer period to amortize its unfunded liabilities?
  • Outcome: Denied; no funding deficiency was projected until 2017.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 412(e); ERISA § 302(b)(2); Reorganization Plan No. 4.

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.00-00
200751029
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
SEP 28 2007
[illegible]

Re:

Dear

This letter is to inform you that your request for an extension of the period of years for amortizing the unfunded liabilities described in section 412(b)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) and section 302(b)(2)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) effective with the plan year beginning September 1, , has been denied.

Section 412(e) of the Code and section 302(b)(2) of ERISA provide that the period of years required to amortize any unfunded liability (described in any clause of section 412(b)(2)(B) of the Code and section 302(b)(2) of ERISA) of any plan may be extended by the Secretary of Labor for a period of time (not in excess of 10 years) if it is determined that such an extension would carry out the purposes of ERISA, and would provide adequate protection for participants under the plan and their beneficiaries and if it is determined that: (1) the failure to permit such extension would result in (A) a substantial risk to the voluntary continuation of the plan, or (B) a substantial curtailment of pension benefit levels or employee compensation, and (2) be adverse to the interest of plan participants in the aggregate.

Reorganization Plan No. 4 (1979-1 C.B. 480), effective December 31, 1978, transferred the authority of the Secretary of Labor under section 412(e) of the Code and section 304(a) of ERISA to the Secretary of Treasury.

The Plan is a multiemployer defined benefit plan. The Plan is maintained as a result of collective bargaining agreements between local bargaining units of the union and related employers, primarily in the movie theater industry. The Plan is a mature plan with a large number of retirements in recent years and an even larger number expected in the near future. The industry has been in decline for a number of years and technology has reduced the number of employees in the industry and reduced wages. These factors increased the gap between the Plan’s costs and employer contributions.

200751029
2

The information provided with your request included projections that reflected the changes made to the minimum funding requirements under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (“PPA 2006”). These projections indicated that the Plan will not experience a funding deficiency until 2017. Given that there is no projected funding deficiency until 2017, an extension will not carry out the purposes of ERISA. Furthermore, failure to grant an extension will not result in (A) a substantial risk to the voluntary continuation of the plan, or (B) a substantial curtailment of pension benefit levels or employee compensation, and (2) will not be adverse to the interest of plan participants in the aggregate.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the
and to your
authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact

Sincerely yours,

James E. Holland, Jr.
Manager, Employee Plans Technical

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace