PLR 200749001: Late dual consolidated loss elections and certifications allowed

Number
200749001
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
September 5, 2007
Publicly released
December 7, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group omitted elections and annual certifications for dual consolidated losses attributable to several foreign branches and disregarded entities over six years. Its in-house return preparers missed the filings, and its outside accountants did not flag them. The IRS found the standards for filing relief satisfied and granted 60 days to submit the elections and the required annual certifications. It explained that annual certifications were not required for the identified foreign branches. The extension did not determine whether the group otherwise qualified to make the elections, including under rules concerning foreign mirror legislation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the group make late dual consolidated loss elections and file related annual certifications?
  • Outcome: A 60-day extension was granted for the specified filings.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2) and 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200749001
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/7/2007
Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1503.04-04
----------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------------
---------------------
--------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------------------------ CC:INTL
----------------
PLR-110141-07
--------------------------------
Date:
---------------------------------------------- September 05, 2007 In Re:
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
------------------------

Domestic Owner = --------------------------------------------------

Entity 1 = ---------------------------------------------------

Entity 2 = ----------------------------------------

Entity 3 = --------------------------

Entity 4 = ----------------------------------------------------

Entity 5 = ------------------------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

PLR-110141-07
2

Year 4 = -------

Year 5 = -------

Year 6 = -------
Country A = ------------

Country B = ------------

Dear -----------------:

This is in response to a letter dated February 26, 2007, requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file elections under Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) or Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2T(g)(2)(i), as applicable (“Elections”), and annual certifications under Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) or Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2T(g)(2)(vi)(B) as applicable (“Annual Certifications”), for Years 1 through 6 with respect to dual consolidated losses attributable to Entities 1 through 5. Additional information was submitted in a letter dated May 31, 2007. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

During Years 1 through 6, Domestic Owner, a member of Taxpayer’s consolidated group, owned 100 percent of the interests in Entity 1 which, in turn, owned 100 percent of the interests in Entity 2 and Entity 4. During Years 1 through 6, Entity 2 owned 100 percent of the interests in Entity 3 and Entity 5. Entities 1 through 5 were organized in Country A and, at all times during Years 1 through 6, were disregarded as entities separate from their owner for federal tax purposes.

During Years 1 through 6, the interests in Entities 3 through 5 were hybrid entity separate units as described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(c)(4). Dual consolidated losses were attributable to the interests in Entities 4 and 5 in Years 1 through 6; however, no dual consolidated losses were attributable to the interests in Entity 3 during such years.

During Years 1 through 6, Entity 1, Entity 2 and Entity 3 each had activities in Country A and Country B that constituted a foreign branch (“Entity 1 Branch”, “Entity 2 Branch” and “Entity 3 Branch”, respectively) within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.367(a)-6T(g). Entity 1 Branch, Entity 2 Branch and Entity 3 Branch were separate units described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(c)(3)(i)(A). Dual consolidated losses were attributable to Entity 1 Branch, Entity 2 Branch and Entity 3 Branch during Years 1 through 6.

PLR-110141-07
3

For Years 1 through 6, Taxpayer relied on its corporate tax department and its outside accountants to prepare and review its consolidated returns and to include the necessary Elections and Annual Certifications with its returns. Taxpayer’s in-house return preparers inadvertently failed to include the necessary Elections and Annual Certifications with the returns for Years 1 through 6, and its outside accountants did not advise Taxpayer of the need to file the necessary Elections and Annual Certifications.

Taxpayer represents that the income tax laws of Country A do not deny the use of losses, expenses, or deductions of Entities 1 through 5 to offset income of another person because the dual resident corporation or separate unit is also subject to income taxation by another country on its worldwide income or on a residence basis.

Taxpayer represents that it filed this application for relief before the Internal Revenue Service discovered the failure to file the required Elections and Annual Certifications. Treas. Reg. § 301-9100-3(b)(1)(i).

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the Elections are regulatory elections as defined in Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time to make these filings, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and information submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the Elections with respect to the dual consolidated losses incurred in Years 1 through 6 attributable to Entity 1 Branch, Entity 2 Branch, Entity 3 Branch, and the interests in Entities 4 and 5. In addition, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the

PLR-110141-07
4

Annual Certifications for Years 2 through 6 with respect to the dual consolidated losses attributable to the interests in Entities 4 and 5.

Taxpayer is not required to file annual certifications with respect to losses attributable to Entity 1 Branch, Entity 2 Branch and Entity 3 Branch, because Entity 1 Branch, Entity 2 Branch and Entity 3 Branch are separate units described in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503- 2(c)(3)(i)(A) and, therefore, an extension of time is not necessary in this regard. Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(C).

The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the election agreements and annual certifications. Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a). For example, a taxpayer that is subject to mirror legislation enacted by a foreign country may be ineligible to file election agreements pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(c)(15)(iv).

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the Elections and Annual Certifications that are the subject of this ruling.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to Taxpayer’s authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

______
John J. Merrick
Special Counsel
Office of Chief Counsel
(International)

Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

CC:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace