PLR 200740003: Dual resident corporation received extension for loss filings

Number
200740003
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
July 3, 2007
Publicly released
October 5, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation resident in both the United States and another country included dual consolidated losses on its U.S. consolidated returns for three years. It omitted required election agreements and annual certifications from returns listed in the ruling's schedule, despite relying on in-house and outside tax professionals. The IRS found the standard for a filing extension satisfied and granted 60 days from the ruling date to submit the missing documents. The ruling did not decide whether the corporation was otherwise eligible to make the elections or file the certifications.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation file late election agreements and annual certifications for dual consolidated losses?
  • Outcome: Yes; the IRS granted a 60-day extension but did not determine underlying eligibility.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200740003
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/5/2007
Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1503.04-04
------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------
---------------------
--------------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-----------------------------
CC:INTL
--------------------------
PLR-111504-04
------------------------------------------------------------ Date:
----------------------------------------------------- July 03, 2007

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
State Y = -------------
Foreign country = --------------------------------------------- X
Date A = --------------------------
Date B = -------------------------
Corp Y = -----------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
CPA Firm A = ---------------------------------------
CPA Firm B = ---------------------------------------------------

Dear ----- ----------:

This replies to your representative’s letter dated December 20, 2004, in which your representative requests on behalf of Taxpayer an extension of time under Treas. Reg.
§301.9100-3 to file the election and agreement described in Treas. Reg. §1.1503- 2(g)(2)(i), and the annual certification described in Treas. Reg. §1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) in accordance with Schedule A, which is attached to and made a part of this ruling letter. Additional information was submitted in letters dated June 16, 2005, August 23, 2005, May 29, 2006, and April 2, 2007. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
PLR-111504-04
2

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

Taxpayer was incorporated in State Y on Date A, and was incorporated in foreign country X on Date B. During years 1, 2 and 3, Taxpayer was indirectly owned by Corp Y, a foreign corporation. Taxpayer was the common parent of a group of affiliated corporations that filed a consolidated U.S. income tax return. Taxpayer is a dual resident corporation as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(c)(2).

Taxpayer incurred dual consolidated losses (DCLs), as defined in Treas. Reg. 1.1503- 2(c)(5), in years 1, 2 and 3 that were included in Taxpayer’s consolidated U.S. income tax return for those years. However, for various reasons discussed in the facts and affidavits, the requisite election agreement described in Treas. Reg. §1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), and the requisite annual certification described in Treas. Reg. §1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) were not included with the consolidated U.S. income tax returns for the years indicated in Schedule A. This omission occurred despite the fact that Taxpayer relied on the tax professionals in Corp Y’s tax department, which was responsible for all U.S. tax matters of Taxpayer, and on outside tax professionals with CPA Firms A and B to ensure that the DCLs would be properly claimed in each year. This omission was subsequently discovered during a review of the tax return filings for years 1, 2 and 3.

Treas. Reg. §301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in §301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. §301.9100-1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election and agreement and the annual certification described in Treas. Reg. §1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) and (vi)(B), respectively, are regulatory elections as defined in §301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary
PLR-111504-04
3

authority under §301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in §301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and information submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth in Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the election and agreement described in Treas. Reg. §1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), and the annual certification described in Treas. Reg. §1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) in accordance with Schedule A. The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the elections and agreements, and the annual certifications. Treas. Reg.
§301.9100-1(a).

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the elections and agreements, and the annual certifications.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to your first and second listed authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Associate Chief Counsel (International)

By:
Thomas Beem
Senior Technical Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

Enclosures (2):
Schedule A
Copy for 6110 purposes

cc:
PLR-111504-04
4

SCHEDULE A

------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace