PLR 200738017: Earlier insurance tax ruling modified to allow a new safe harbor

Number
200738017
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Adjustments for Increase or Decrease; Reduction of Deduction
Topics
Code sections
§ 264, § 807, § 832, § 6110
Ruling dated
September 11, 2007
Publicly released
September 21, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS modified a May 2007 ruling about how references to the interest disallowance rule in section 264(f) apply in sections 807 and 832. The earlier ruling said those references did not incorporate exceptions to that rule. This letter adds the safe harbor in Revenue Procedure 2007-61, including its effective date. The taxpayer may rely on the safe harbor if its proposed transaction falls within the procedure's scope. The letter gives no further opinion on the transaction's tax consequences.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer use the newly published safe harbor despite the earlier ruling?
  • Outcome: Yes, if the proposed transaction is within the safe harbor's scope.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 264(f), 807, 832; Rev. Proc. 2007-61.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200738017
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/21/2007
Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Person To Contact:
Index Number: 807.01-00, 832.07-00
--------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------
-------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-------------------------
CC:FIP:B04
----------------------------------
PLR-154456-06
Date:
September 11, 2007

Taxpayer: --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear ----------------------:

Pursuant to § 11.04 of Rev. Proc. 2007-1, 2007-1 I.R.B. 1, 49, this letter is to modify our letter to you of May 3, 2007 in which we ruled that the references to § 264(f) in §§ 807(a)(2)(B), 807(b)(1)(B) and 832(b)(5)(B)(iii) do not take into account the exceptions to the application of the interest disallowance rule of § 264(f).

Specifically, our May 3, 2007 letter is modified to incorporate the safe harbor described in Revenue Procedure 2007-61, 2007 – 40 I.R.B. (October 1, 2007), including the effective date. Accordingly, you may rely on this safe harbor if your proposed transaction is within its scope.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to Taxpayer. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Taxpayer’s authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, for a return(s) filed electronically this requirement is satisfied by attaching a statement to the return(s) that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

PLR-154456-06
2

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

Stephen D. Hooe
Stephen D. Hooe
Special Counsel
Associate Chief Counsel (Financial
Institutions and Products)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace