CCA 200738012: Railroad business classified as an employer for tax purposes

Number
200738012
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Employers v. Not Employers
Code sections
§ 3231
Ruling dated
May 21, 2007
Publicly released
September 21, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Railroad Retirement Board told the IRS that a redacted business had become an employer under two railroad benefit laws. Chief Counsel reviewed that opinion and concluded the business also became an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act on the redacted effective date. The memorandum notes that the business may be disregarded as a separate entity for employment tax purposes because another entity wholly owns it. If so, that owner may file the required railroad tax returns. The receiving IRS unit was asked to take appropriate action.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Was the business an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act?
  • Outcome: Advice given: yes, subject to a possible disregarded entity filing arrangement.
  • Key authorities: Railroad Retirement Tax Act; Railroad Retirement Act; Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act.

Full text (IRS public release)

Office of Chief Counsel

Memorandum
Internal Revenue Service

Number: 200738012
Release Date: 9/21/2007
CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1
POSTN-113880-07

UILC: 3231.01-00

date: May 21, 2007
to: Director, Submission Processing
Cincinnati, OH
Attn: Entity Unit

from: Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel Tax Exempt & Government Entities

subject: Railroad Retirement Tax Act Status

In accordance with the coordination procedure established between the Service and the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), the RRB has provided us with its opinion that the following business became an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act effective -----------------------:

------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------

We have reviewed the opinion of the RRB and, based upon the information submitted to us by the RRB, we also conclude that ---------------------------------------------------- became an employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act effective -----------------------.
However, the RRB opinion indicates that -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------is wholly owned by -----------------------------------------------------. Thus, ------------------------------ ----------------------- may be disregarded as a separate entity for employment tax purposes. In such case, ------------------------------------------------------may be filing the necessary tax returns under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. Please take the appropriate action regarding this business.

POSTN-113880-07
2

_____
Janine Cook cc: ----------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
--------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace