PLR 200735018: Late GST exemption allocations allowed for three trusts

Number
200735018
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Tax On Generation Skipping Transfers; Inclusion Ratio; Special Election for QTIP; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 2601, § 2631, § 2632, § 2642
Ruling dated
May 24, 2007
Publicly released
August 31, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer made transfers to three trusts, each benefiting one daughter and her descendants. She intended to use her generation-skipping transfer tax exemption for the transfers, but the professional who prepared her gift tax return failed to allocate it. The IRS found that the requirements for late election relief were met and gave her 60 days from the ruling letter to file a supplemental Form 709. Her available exemption allocations would take effect as of the original transfer dates and use the assets' values on those dates.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer make late GST exemption allocations effective on the original transfer dates?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file a supplemental gift tax return.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 2642(g)(1); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200735018
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/31/2007
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2601.00-00, 2642.00-00,
2652.01-02, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------
(202) 622-7830
----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B09
PLR-140898-06
Date:
May 24, 2007

LEGEND:

Taxpayer = ------------------------
Husband = -------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Trusts = -----------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------
x = -----------
CPA = ------------------
Attorney = -----------------------------
Year 2 = -------

Dear -----------------:

This responds to your representative’s letter dated August 14, 2006, requesting an extension of time under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make allocations of generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption to several trusts.

FACTS

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows. In Year 1, Taxpayer and Husband created separate trusts for the benefit of each of their three daughters and the respective daughter’s issue (“the Trusts”). Except for the beneficiaries, the terms of the Trusts were the same.

In Year 1, Taxpayer made a transfer valued at $x to each of the three Trusts. Taxpayer retained the services of CPA to prepare her United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return (Form 709) for Year 1. CPA was aware
PLR-140898-06
2

that Taxpayer intended the Trusts to be exempt from GST tax; however, CPA inadvertently failed to allocate Taxpayer’s GST exemption to the Year 1 transfers.

Attorney discovered the error on the Form 709 in Year 2. Taxpayer is requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 2642(g) and §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to allocate GST exemption to the Year 1 transfers to the Trusts and is requesting a ruling that the GST exemption allocated to the transfers will be effective as of the date of the transfers.

Law and Analysis

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST. A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as: (1) a taxable distribution; (2) a taxable termination; and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate.

Section 2641(a) defines the term "applicable rate" with respect to any GST as the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

Section 2642(a)(1) provides that, generally, the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in a GST is the excess of 1 over the "applicable fraction." With respect to a GST that is not a direct skip, § 2642(a)(2) provides that, in general, the applicable fraction is a fraction the numerator of which is the amount of the GST exemption under § 2631 allocated to the trust and the denominator of which is the value of the property transferred to the trust.

Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount that may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable. Section 2631(c) provides that the GST exemption amount for any calendar year shall be equal to the applicable exclusion amount under § 2010(c) for such calendar year.

Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2) provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the transferor's lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.
PLR-140898-06
3

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall, by regulation, prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of this paragraph.

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust as a GST trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except in subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that, in general, requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3.

Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with
§ 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an election described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
PLR-140898-06
4

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or to advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of sixty (60) days from the date of this letter to allocate her available GST exemption to the transfers made to the Trusts in Year 1. The allocations will be effective as of the date of the transfers, and will be based on the full value of the assets transferred to the Trusts on the date of the transfers. The allocations should be made on a supplemental Form 709 for the year in which the transfers were made and the Form 709 should be filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to the return.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

William P. O’Shea
Associate Chief Counsel
Passthroughs & Special Industries

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace