PLR 200734014: S corporation status restored after shares reached ineligible owner

Number
200734014
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Election by Small Business Corporation; Eligible v. Ineligible
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
May 14, 2007
Publicly released
August 24, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation transferred shares to an ineligible shareholder, which terminated its S election. Income from those shares had been reported by two eligible shareholders, and the company later canceled and reissued the shares to them. The IRS agreed the termination was inadvertent and treated the company as continuously an S corporation from the transfer date onward, provided its election was not otherwise terminated. The company and shareholders agreed to make any adjustments the IRS required to reflect S corporation treatment.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company retain S corporation status after shares were transferred to an ineligible shareholder?
  • Outcome: Approved: the inadvertent termination was disregarded under section 1362(f).
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(1)(B), 1362(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200734014
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/24/2007
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.00-00, 1362.01-00
Person To Contact:
------------------
-----------------------, ID No. -------------
----------------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------
---------------------
--------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-149655-06
Date: May 14, 2007

Legend

X = ------------------
--------------------------------------------------

Y = --------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

A = --------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

B = --------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------

n = -----

n1 = -----

n2 = ----

State = -----------

D1 = ----------------------

D2 = -----------------------

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated October 9, 2006, submitted on behalf of X, requesting relief for an inadvertent termination under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
PLR-149655-06
2

FACTS

According to the information submitted, X was incorporated on D1 pursuant to the laws of State, and filed an S corporation election, effective D1. On D2, n shares of X were transferred to an ineligible shareholder, Y. Despite this transfer, however, the net income attributable to the n shares transferred to Y was reported by two taxpayers, A and B, represented to be eligible S corporation shareholders. To rectify the situation, X has cancelled the stock certificate of the n shares and reissued n1 and n2 shares to A and B, respectively.

X represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of X’s S corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any taxable year, a “small business corporation” for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that an S corporation cannot have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) will be terminated whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B) provides that the termination shall be effective on and after the date of cessation.

Section 1362(f) provides in relevant part that if: (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2); (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in such termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation for which the termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of such corporation as an S corporation, as the case may be) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then,
PLR-149655-06
3

notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such termination, such corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

Based solely upon the facts presented and the representations made, we conclude that X’s S corporation election terminated on D2. We also conclude that the termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from D2 and thereafter, provided that X’s subchapter S election is not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the above-described facts under any other provision of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

David R. Haglund
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace