CCA 200733022: Railroad tax coverage limited to rail transportation workforce
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Railroad Retirement Board reconsidered the status of a business under common control of a rail carrier. IRS Chief Counsel agreed that the business was a covered employer under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act for the redacted period. The coverage applied only to the identifiable part of its workforce engaged in transporting property by rail, including the predecessor employee group described in the memo. Chief Counsel asked the IRS processing unit to act on that conclusion.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Which employees of the business were covered by the Railroad Retirement Tax Act?
- Outcome: Advice that coverage applies only to the specified rail transportation workforce.
- Key authorities: Railroad Retirement Tax Act; IRC § 3231 (UILC).
Full text (IRS public release)
Office of Chief Counsel
Memorandum
Internal Revenue Service
Number: 200733022
Release Date: 8/17/2007
CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1
POSTN-112709-07
UILC: 3231.01-00
date: May 14, 2007
to: Director, Submission Processing
Cincinnati, OH
Attn: Entity Unit
from: Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel Tax Exempt & Government Entities
subject: Railroad Retirement Tax Act Status
In accordance with the coordination procedure established between the Service and the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), the RRB has provided us with its opinion that, upon reconsideration, the following business was under common control of a rail carrier employer engaged in the transportation of property by rail under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act for the period -------------- ----------------thru --------------but only with respect to employees of the ------------------------- and its predecessor employee group:
-------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a departure from the RRB’s prior opinion that ------------------. was a covered employer only with regard to the finding that there is a segregable business. We have reviewed the opinion of the RRB and, based upon the information submitted to us by the RRB, we also reaffirm our earlier opinion of ----------------------------------------------------- (copy attached) and conclude that ------------------. was a covered employer under the jurisdiction of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, for the period ----------------through -------- -------------.
POSTN-112709-07
2
However, we also agree that this status applies only with respect to the segregable
portion of the taxpayer’s workforce engaged in the transportation of property by rail.
Please take the appropriate action regarding this business.
____
Janine Cook
Attachment:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace