PLR 200730003: Required insurer capital counts toward value after ownership change

Number
200730003
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Limitation on Net Operating Loss Carry-forwards and Built-in Losses Following Ownership Changes
Code sections
§ 382, § 6110
Ruling dated
April 27, 2007
Publicly released
July 27, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A foreign parent contributed capital to its US life insurance group to maintain regulatory and rating agency capital levels. A planned sale of newly issued parent shares would cause the US life insurer to undergo an ownership change, triggering the section 382 limit on use of tax losses. The insurer asked whether capital contributions made during the preceding two years had to be excluded from its value when calculating that limit. Relying on representations that the contributions served minimum capitalization or routine operating needs, the IRS ruled they would not be excluded under section 382(l)(1). The ruling addressed that value calculation only.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Must recent capital contributions be excluded from the insurer's value when calculating its section 382 limit?
  • Outcome: Approved; the stated contributions remain in the old loss corporation's value.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 382(b), (g), (l)(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200730003
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 7/27/2007
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 382.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------
------------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------
---------------------
---------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------
CC:CORP:BO1
PLR-107310-07
In Re: Date:
-------------------------------
April 27, 2007

Foreign Parent = -----------------------------------

Foreign Sub 1 = ---------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------

Foreign Sub 2 = ---------------------------------------------

US Holdings = ------------------------------

US Life Parent = -------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

US Life Group = ---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------

US Life Sub 1 = ---------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
US Life Sub 2 = --------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
US Life LLC = -----------------------------

Date 1 = --------------

Date 2 = ----------------

County X = ----------------------
PLR-107310-07
2

County Y = -------------

State A = -------------

R = -----------------------------------

$aa = ----------------

$bb = ----------------

Dear --------------------

This letter is in reply to your authorized representative's letter dated February 8, 2007, requesting rulings regarding certain Federal income tax consequences resulting from an anticipated ownership change as defined in § 382(g) of the Internal Revenue Code. The information submitted is summarized below.

The rulings contained in this letter are based on facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the materials submitted in support of the request for rulings. Verification of the information, representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.

Summary of Facts

Foreign Parent is a Country X holding company that has operations in several countries, including the United States. Foreign Parent owns all of the stock of Foreign Sub 1, a Country X insurance company. Foreign Sub 1 owns all of the stock of Foreign Sub 2, a Country Y corporation. Foreign Sub 2 owns all of the stock of US Holding, a State A corporation that primarily acts as the holding company for other United States subsidiaries in the Foreign Parent group. US Holding holds all of the stock of US Life Parent, a State A corporation that is the common parent for a life insurance group (the US Life Group) that files a consolidated Federal income tax return. The US Life Group includes US Life Parent and its subsidiaries US Life Sub 1 and US Life Sub 2. US Life Parent wholly owns US Life LLC, which has elected under § 301.7701-3 of the Income Tax Regulations to be an entity disregarded from its sole owner and which owns the stock of US Life Sub 1.

As an insurance company, US Life Parent is subject to extensive insurance regulation and supervision. Generally, state regulatory agencies and private-sector rating agencies monitor compliance with, and periodically conduct examinations regarding many of the following benchmarks: state mandated standards of solvency, licensing requirements, investment limitations, restrictions on the size of risks which may be reinsured, deposits of securities for the benefit of reinsureds, methods of
PLR-107310-07
3

accounting, and reserves for unearned premiums, losses and other purposes. In order to make these determinations of minimum capitalization, these regulatory and rating agencies look to a formula that is based upon the “Risk Based Capital” (RBC) of the insurance company.

US Life Parent, on behalf of itself and each of its life insurance subsidiaries, is required to calculate minimum capitalization levels for review by various constituencies that use an insurance company’s RBC ratio as a component of a company’s financial strength. State insurance regulators impose certain minimum RBC requirements on insurance companies.

Private-sector rating agencies such as R also consider capitalization as a primary measure of financial strength. Each rating agency defines their version of RBC and provides guidance as to minimum levels to maintain rating agency ratings. If an insurance company does not maintain the minimum level of capital defined by the rating agencies for the current rating level, the rating agency will reduce the rating. Maintaining ratings is necessary for general business operations of a reinsurance company because poor ratings could make it difficult to attract new business.

Generally, when US Life Parent requires additional capital to meet the capitalization requirements described above, Foreign Parent or its subsidiaries contribute capital to US Life Parent. Foreign Parent contributed to US Life Parent approximately $aa in 2005 and approximately $bb in 2006 to maintain these required minimum capitalization levels (the “Capital Contributions”). The Capital Contributions include contributions made during the two-year period ending on Date 2, which is the anticipated closing date of the Proposed Transaction defined below.

Proposed Transaction

On or about Date 2, a number of investors will purchase newly issued Foreign Parent stock (the “Proposed Transaction”). As a result, US Life Parent will undergo an ownership change as defined in § 382(g)

Representations

The following representations have been submitted regarding the Proposed Transaction and the Capital Contributions:

(a) US Life Parent is the parent of a loss group as defined in Treas. Reg.
§ 1.1502-91(c).

(b) US Life Parent has not undergone an ownership change as defined in § 382(g) since Date 1 (a date more than three years before Date 2).
PLR-107310-07
4

(c) The Proposed Transaction will cause an ownership change as defined in § 382(g) for US Life Parent on the date the Proposed Transaction is consummated.

(d) Each Capital Contribution was made solely to maintain minimum recommended capitalization requirements under various rating and regulatory agency guidelines or to pay routine operating expenses of the US Life Group.

Ruling

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations set forth above, we rule that the Capital Contributions will not be excluded from the value of the old loss corporation under § 382(l)(1) for purposes of computing the value of the old loss corporation and the § 382 limitation within the meaning of § 382(b).

Caveats

We express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the proposed transactions under any other provision of the Code or regulations, or concerning any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the Proposed Transaction that are not specifically covered by the above ruling.

Procedural Statements

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

In accordance with a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

_______
Michael J. Wilder
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace