CCA 200716025: Withdrawn ruling request prompts tentative treaty analysis of seller payments
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
After a company withdrew its private letter ruling request, Chief Counsel notified an IRS field manager of its tentative view on payments to sellers resident in a foreign country. For individual sellers, the memorandum treats the payments as income from independent personal services taxable in the United States under the treaty only to the extent tied to a regularly available U.S. fixed base. For corporate sellers, it treats them as business profits taxable there only to the extent tied to a U.S. permanent establishment. Properly completed withholding forms could allow exemption from withholding for payments exempt under the treaty. The memorandum says its conclusions are tentative and are not binding on Examination or Appeals.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: When may treaty rules tax or exempt the described payments to foreign resident sellers?
- Outcome: Advice given as tentative conclusions after withdrawal of the ruling request.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 861, 862, 864, 1441, 1442; treaty Articles VII and XIV; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1441-4, 1.1441-6.
Full text (IRS public release)
Office of Chief Counsel
---------------------------
Internal Revenue Service
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memorandum
-------------
Number: 200716025
Release Date: 4/20/2007
CC:INTL:B01:ACGuzman
Third Party Communication: None
PRENO-157659-06
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
UILC: 9114.03-06
date: March 02, 2007
to: James Roosey, Program Manager
Retail, Food, Pharmaceuticals, and Health (Field Operations West - Territory 2)
from: M. Grace Fleeman, Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 1(International) Ana C. Guzman, General Attorney, Branch 1 (International)
subject: Notice of Withdrawal of Ruling Request PLR-125404-06
In accordance with section 7.07(2) of Rev. Proc. 2007-1, 2007-1 I.R.B. 1, we are providing you with notification of a taxpayer withdrawal of a private letter ruling request.
On December 11, 2006, the taxpayer’s representative withdrew the above-referenced request for a private letter ruling after this office advised such taxpayer and its representative of its tentative conclusions. Following is a brief discussion of the issue, facts, applicable law, and the reason for this office’s tentative conclusions. A copy of the taxpayer’s request is attached. This memorandum is not binding on Examination or Appeals and is not a final case determination. This document is not to be used or cited as precedent.
LEGEND
Payor = --------------------------------------------------------------------
Parent = ----------------------------------------
Products = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRENO-157659-06
2
Earnings = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Country A = -----------
Treaty = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
FSA = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
ISSUE
Whether Earnings paid by Payor to a -------------- who is a resident of Country A (“Country A ---------------) with respect to purchases and sales of Products by ---------------
--------------- in the United States (“U.S. ----------------”) are exempt from U.S. tax under the treaty.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the information available to us, our tentative conclusions are as follows:
1. Earnings paid to a Country A -------------- who is a nonresident alien individual constitute income in respect of independent personal services that, pursuant to Article XIV of the Treaty, may be taxed in the United States only to the extent attributable to a fixed base that is, or was, regularly available to the Country A -------------- in the United States. Earnings that are exempt from U.S. tax pursuant to Article XIV may be exempt from withholding under section 1441 if the Country A -------------- provides a properly completed Form 8233.
2. Earnings paid to a Country A ---------------that is a foreign corporation constitute business profits that, pursuant to Article VII of the Treaty, may be taxed in the United States only to the extent attributable to a permanent establishment in the United States through which the Country A ---------------carries on, or has carried on, business. Earnings that are exempt from U.S. tax pursuant to Article VII may be exempt from withholding under section 1442 if the Country A -------------- provides a properly completed Form W-8BEN.
FACTS
Payor is an indirect U.S. subsidiary of Parent, a -------------------------------corporation. Parent and its subsidiaries constitute a -----------------------------------company that sells
PRENO-157659-06
3
Products. Products are distributed through ------------------------------------. The ruling request relates solely to the taxation of Country A ----------------.
Country A ---------------- are generally individuals, although there are currently some that are corporations. Payor represents that the Country A --------------- are independent contractors and not employees of Payor.
A -------------- may earn income in two ways:
1. A -------------- may buy Products directly from Payor or an affiliate and sell those Products to the ultimate customers. The -------------- pockets the difference between the discounted price the -------------- pays for the Products and the full price paid by the ultimate customers. Payor did not request a ruling with regard to this income.
2. In addition, ---------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------receive Earnings based on purchases and sales by ------------------------------------. The Earnings that were the subject of the ruling request are paid by Payor to Country A -------------------------------------
-------------------- based on purchases and sales by ------------------------------who are U.S. residents. The -------------U.S. ---------------- are not dependent agents or employees of the ---------------Country A ---------------- whose products they purchase and sell.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------), Payor has been withholding 30% of the Earnings paid to ---------------- who are nonresident alien individuals and foreign corporations.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Our conclusion, based on all the information available to us, is that Earnings paid to Country A ---------------- are compensation for the Country A ----------------- --------------------
-----------services, as measured by the sales production of the -------------U.S. ---------------
----------------. These services are performed by Country A --------------- in a number of ways, including contacts in person, by telephone, or through the Internet. If, within a particular taxable year, any of the services are performed within the United States, the Country A -------------- is engaged in trade or business within the United States for that year. Code § 864(b). Earnings attributable to services performed within the United States are from sources within the United States, while Earnings attributable to services performed in Country A (or elsewhere outside the United States) are from sources without the United States. Code § 861(a)(3), § 862(a)(3).
Nonresident alien individuals. Under Article XIV of the Treaty, income derived by an individual who is a resident of Country A in respect of independent personal services
PRENO-157659-06
4
may be taxed in the United States if the individual has or had a fixed base regularly available to him in the United States, but only to the extent that the income is attributable to the fixed base. Thus, even if a Country A -------------- who is an individual performs some services in the United States resulting in some U.S.-source income, the Earnings attributable to those services would not be subject to U.S. tax unless they were attributable to a fixed base.
Under Treas. Reg. § 1.1441-4(b)(1)(iv) and Treas. Reg. § 1.1441-4(b)(2), Earnings paid to a Country A -------------- who is an individual may be exempt from withholding under section 1441 if the Country A -------------- provides a properly completed Form 8233.
Foreign corporations. Under Article VII of the Treaty, the business profits of a foreign corporation that is a resident of Country A may be taxed in the United States if the foreign corporation carries on business in the United States through a permanent establishment situated in the United States, but only to the extent that the business profits are attributable to the permanent establishment. Thus, even if a Country A -------
-------------- that is a foreign corporation performs some activities in the United States resulting in some U.S.-source income, the Earnings attributable to those activities will not be subject to U.S. tax unless they are attributable to a permanent establishment.
Under Treas. Reg. § 1.1441-6(b), Earnings paid to a Country A -------------- that is a foreign corporation may be exempt from withholding under section 1442 if the Country A
-------------- provides a properly completed Form W-8BEN.
CASE DEVELOPMENT, HAZARDS AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may undermine our ability to protect the privileged information. If disclosure is determined to be necessary, please contact this office for our views.
Please call (202) 622-3880 if you have any further questions.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace