PLR 200715001: Couple gets 60 days to allocate GST exemptions to three trusts

Number
200715001
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inclusion Ratio; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 2513, § 2601, § 2602, § 2611, § 2631, § 2632, § 2641, § 2642
Ruling dated
December 1, 2006
Publicly released
April 13, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple created three trusts, one for each child, and each spouse transferred assets to all three. They filed timely gift tax returns, but the accountant preparing them omitted allocations of the spouses' generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemptions. The IRS found that the requirements for late allocation relief were met and gave each spouse 60 days to file a separate supplemental Form 709. The allocations would take effect on the transfer dates, and each trust's inclusion ratio would depend on the gift tax value of its transfers and the exemption allocated to it. The ruling did not cover the couple's separate direct gifts to grandchildren.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could each spouse make late GST exemption allocations for transfers to the three trusts?
  • Outcome: Approved; each spouse received a 60-day extension.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2631, 2632, 2642(g); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200715001
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/13/2007
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2642.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
-----------------------
----------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------------
Telephone Number:
--------------
---------------------
----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:04
PLR-129049-06
-------------------
Date: DECEMBER 01, 2006
-------------------------------
--------------
----------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------

Legend

     Husband           -        -------------------------------------------------
     Wife              -        --------------------------------------------
     Child A           -        -----------------------
     Child B           -        -------------------------------
     Child C           -        -------------------------

Trust A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- Trust B - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Trust C - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Date - -------------------------
year - -------
S - -----------
T - -------------
U - -------------
V - -------------
W - ------------- -----------
X
-

Dear ------------------------------------:

This letter is in response to a letter dated June 6, 2006, from your authorized representative requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations and § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code to make
PLR-129049-06
2

allocations of Husband’s and Wife’s respective generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemptions.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

On Date in Year, Husband and Wife (Taxpayers) established three substantially identical irrevocable trusts, one for the benefit of each of their three children: Trust A for the benefit of Child A, Trust B for the benefit of Child B, and Trust C for the benefit of Child C. Each trust is a generation-skipping transfer (GST) trust as defined in § 2632(c)(3)(B). On Date, Husband transferred assets valued at $S to Trust A, assets valued at $T to Trust B, and assets valued at $U to Trust C. On the same day, Wife transferred assets valued at $S to Trust A, assets valued at $V to Trust B, and assets valued at $W to Trust C. In addition, during Year, Taxpayers also each made transfers of $X directly to six separate grandchildren.

Taxpayers timely filed separate United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Returns, Forms 709, (gift tax returns) to report their transfers to Trust A, Trust B, and Trust C. They did not consent to split the gifts pursuant to § 2513. Although the law firm that assisted Taxpayers advised them of the necessity to allocate their respective GST exemptions to the transfers, the certified public accountant, who prepared the returns and on whose expertise Taxpayers relied, inadvertently failed to allocate Taxpayers’ available GST tax exemptions to the transfers.

It is represented that no additions have been made to Trust A, Trust B, or Trust C since Year, and no distributions have been made to skip persons from any of the trusts.

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation- skipping transfer is defined under section 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines “applicable rate” as the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

Under § 2642(a)(1), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in a generation-skipping transfer is generally defined as the excess of 1 over the “applicable fraction.” The applicable fraction, as defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of GST exemption under § 2631 allocated to the trust (or to property transferred in a direct skip), and the denominator is the value of the property transferred to the trust or involved in the direct skip.

Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $1,000,000 (adjusted for inflation under § 2631(c)) which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any
PLR-129049-06
3

property with respect to which such individual is the transferor.

Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the transferor’s lifetime, other than a direct skip, is made on Form 709.

Section 2642(b)(1) provides, in relevant part, that if the allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a timely filed gift tax return for such transfer, the value of such property for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12, and such allocation shall be effective on and after the date of such transfer.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall, by regulation, prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of enactment of § 2642(g)(1)(A), which was enacted into law on June 7, 2001.

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time for making the allocation shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers is to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
PLR-129049-06
4

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that, in general, requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3.

Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an election described in § 2642(b)(1) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or to advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Husband and Wife are each granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to make allocations of their respective GST exemptions for their transfers to Trust A, Trust B, and Trust C in Year. Separate individual supplemental Form 709s should be filed for Husband and Wife for Year. Each Form 709 should include a Notice of Allocation properly allocating the Taxpayers’ GST exemption to the transfers to Trust A, Trust B, and Trust C. The allocations will be effective as of the respective dates of the transfers to the trusts, and the inclusion ratio of each trust will be determined based on the value of the transfers to each trust as determined for federal gift tax purposes and the amount of exemption allocated to each trust. A copy of this letter should be attached to each individual supplemental Form 709 and filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45999. Copies are included for this purpose.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by Taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.
PLR-129049-06
5

Pursuant to the Power of Attorney on file with this office, this letter is being sent to Taxpayers' representative.

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

William P. O'Shea
Associate Chief Counsel
Passthroughs & Special Industries

Enclosures
Copy for section 6110 purposes
2 copies of this letter

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace