PLR 200709008: City must report commercial building renovation reimbursements

Number
200709008
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Gross Income v. Not Gross Income; Information at Source
Code sections
§ 61, § 6041
Ruling dated
November 13, 2006
Publicly released
March 2, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A city reimbursed owners and long-term tenants for renovating downtown commercial buildings and asked whether it had to file information returns. Eligibility did not depend on the recipients' income or financial need. The IRS concluded that the payments were gross income under IRC § 61: the general welfare exclusion did not apply to renovations of commercial buildings that were not based on individual or family needs. The city therefore had to report the payments under IRC § 6041 on Form 1099-MISC and furnish statements to recipients. The ruling excepted payments to corporations and other entities exempt from reporting under Treas. Reg. § 1.6041-3(p).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Must the city report reimbursements for commercial building renovations?
  • Outcome: Advice given: payments are taxable income and generally require information reporting.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 61, 6041; Treas. Reg. § 1.6041-3(p).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200709008
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/2/2007
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 61.00-00, 6041.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------
--------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------
CC:IT&A:05
PLR-112885-04
In Re: ------------------------------------ Date:
--------------------------------------------
November 13, 2006
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

----------------------------
------------------------------
-------------------------------

LEGEND:

City = ------------------

State = --------

Program A = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Program B = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear ----. ----------:

This letter responds to your ruling request submitted on behalf of the City by a letter dated November 26, 2003, as supplemented on February 19, 2004. Your request relates to whether the City is required to file information returns for payments made under the Programs described below. The reporting requirement for these payments depends in part upon whether the payments are taxable income to the recipients; consequently, the necessary analysis of the nature of the payments to the recipients is herein included.

BACKGROUND

The City is a municipal government incorporated under the laws of State. The City implemented Programs A and B to revive the City’s downtown commercial buildings by providing incentives to building owners and long-term tenants to undertake renovation projects. In particular, Program A was established to rehabilitate the interior, and Program B was established to restore the exterior, of the City’s downtown commercial
PLR-112885-04
2

buildings. Building owners and long-term tenants of the City’s downtown commercial buildings are entitled to participate in the Programs regardless of their income levels or financial needs.

In order to receive assistance from the City under the Programs, building owners and long-term tenants of the City’s downtown commercial buildings must satisfy several conditions. The conditions generally include hiring local prevailing wage contractors who are licensed by the City for projects, prepayment of project costs, and an agreement to permit the City to inspect the completed projects and documents involved in the projects. Once the conditions are satisfied, the City reimburses project costs to the qualified applicants up to a set maximum amount.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 6041 of the Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter the “Code”) requires all persons engaged in a trade or business and making payment in the course of such trade or business to another person, of rent, salaries, wages, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments, or other fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income of $600 or more in any taxable year, to file an information return with the Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter the “Service”) and to furnish an information statement to the payee.

As used in section 6041 of the Code, only fixed or determinable (i.e., taxable) income must be reported. The payments of compensation (and other amounts) required to be reported under section 6041 are those includible in gross income under section 61 of the Code. Accordingly, in order to decide whether the City is required to furnish an information return to the recipients of assistance under the Programs, it is necessary to examine whether the payments are includible in gross income.

Section 61(a) of the Code and the Income Tax Regulations (hereinafter the “Regulations”) thereunder provide that, except as otherwise provided by law, gross income means all income from whatever source derived. See also section 1.61 -1(a) of the Regulations. Under section 61, Congress intended to tax all gains or undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, over which the taxpayers have complete dominion. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955).

However, the Service has consistently concluded that payments to individuals by governmental units under legislated social benefit programs for the promotion of the general welfare of the public are not includible in a recipient’s gross income. See, e.g., Rev. Rul. 74-205, 1974-1 C.B. 20; Rev. Rul. 98-19, 1998-1 C.B. 840. To qualify under the general welfare exclusion, payments must (i) be made from a governmental fund, (ii) be for the promotion of general welfare (i.e., generally based on individual or family
PLR-112885-04
3

needs such as housing, education, and basic sustenance expenses), and (iii) not represent compensation for services. Rev. Rul. 75-246, 1975-1 C.B. 24; Rev. Rul. 76- 144, 1976-1 C.B. 17; Rev. Rul. 82-106, 1982-1 C.B. 16. Payments to businesses, generally, do not qualify under the general welfare exclusion because the payments are not based on individual or family needs. See Bailey v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 1293, 1300-01 (1987), acq., 1989-2 C.B. 1; Notice 2003-18, 2003-1 C.B. 699.

In Rev. Rul. 76-395, 1976-2 C.B. 16, the Service ruled that payments made to low- income individuals primarily in order to subsidize home improvements necessary to correct building code violations and thereby provide safe and decent housing were excluded from the recipients’ income under the general welfare doctrine.

In Rev. Rul. 76-131, 1976-1 C.B. 16, the Service ruled that payments made by the State of Alaska to long-term residents were not excluded by the general welfare exclusion because the payments were based on the recipient’s age and residency requirements, regardless of financial or employment status, health, or educational background.

In Rev. Rul. 2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B. 120, the Service concluded that a grant that a business received under a state program to reimburse losses from a natural disaster was not excluded under the general welfare doctrine.

The Programs here differ materially from the home rehabilitation program described in Rev. Rul. 76-395. The renovations subsidized by the Programs are for commercial buildings and not for the promotion of general welfare, which is based on individual or family needs. Therefore, payments made pursuant to the Programs are not excluded from gross income under the general welfare doctrine and are includible in gross income. See Bailey at 1300-01. Accordingly, the City is required to file information returns with the Service and to furnish information statements to the recipients with respect to payments under the Programs. Form 1099-MISC should be used, and the amount of the assistance should be included in box 3 as “Other Income.”

CONCLUSION

For these reasons, we conclude that payments under the Programs will represent gross income to the qualified applicants, and that the City is subject to the resulting information reporting requirements of section 6041 with respect to the Programs, unless the recipient is a corporation or other specified entity, payment to which is exempt under section 1.6041-3(p) of the Regulations.
PLR-112885-04
4

This document may not be used or cited as precedent. See section 6110(k)(3) of the Code.

Sincerely,

____
John Aramburu
Senior Counsel
Branch 5
Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace