PLR 200704038: Mistaken non-IRA deposits receive rollover deadline waiver

Number
200704038
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Rollover Contributions
Code sections
§ 408, § 401, § 72
Ruling dated
November 3, 2006
Publicly released
January 26, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A 78-year-old taxpayer asked a financial institution to roll over distributions from two IRAs and signed paperwork believing he had opened IRA certificates of deposit. The institution instead placed both amounts in non-IRA accounts. While caring for his spouse with a debilitating mental condition, he did not discover the mistake until his accountant prepared his tax return. The IRS found the documentation consistent with financial-institution error and waived the 60-day deadline under section 408(d)(3)(I). It allowed 60 days from the ruling to complete eligible rollovers, subject to all other requirements. The relief excluded amounts required to be distributed for 2005 and 2006.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can institution error in opening non-IRA accounts instead of rollover IRAs justify deadline relief?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a new 60-day window and required distributions excluded.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 408(d)(3)(I), 408(d)(3)(E), 401(a)(9)(C); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

200704038

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION

NOV - 3 2006

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

Legend:

Taxpayer A =
Taxpayer B =
IRA X =

IRA Y =

Amount A =
Amount T =
Financial Institution M =
Date 1 =

Date 2 =

Date 3 =

Date 4=

Dear

This is in response to your request dated March 22, 2006, as supplemented by correspondence dated August 14, 2006, submitted on your behalf by your

authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (“the

Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested

Taxpayer A, age 78, received a distribution on Date 1, 2005, from IRA Y totaling Amount A. Taxpayer A received a distribution on Date 2, 2005, from IRA X totaling Amount T. It is asserted that Taxpayer A’s failure to accomplish a rollover of either distribution within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) was due to errors and misunderstandings on the part of employees of Financial Institution M. Taxpayer A further represents that Amounts A and T have not been used for any other purpose.

200704038

Page 2

Taxpayer A asserts that on or about Date 3, 2005, Taxpayer A contacted Financial Institution M to accomplish a rollover of Amount A into an IRA, and on or about Date 4, 2005, Taxpayer again contacted Financial Institution M to accomplish an IRA rollover of Amount T. On each date Taxpayer A indicated to Financial Institution M representatives that he had closed his IRA account and wished to roll over these amounts into another IRA. On each occasion Taxpayer A signed and returned paperwork sent him by Financial Institution M believing he had purchased an IRA CD and had established a rollover account.

During this period, Taxpayer A was the primary care giver for his spouse who has been diagnosed with a debilitating mental condition. As a result, Taxpayer A was unable to monitor his financial affairs as closely as he would have liked and did not realize that the papers he was signing did not establish an IRA account.

In calendar year 2006, while completing Taxpayer A's calendar year 2005 Federal income tax return, Taxpayer A's certified public accountant informed Taxpayer A that Amounts A and T were invested in non-IRA accounts at Financial Institution M. Said Amounts A and T remain invested in non-IRA vehicles.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue Service waive the 60 day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount A contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Code ("the Code").

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

200704038

Page 3

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60- day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent with his assertion that a failure to accomplish a rollover of either IRA distribution within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) was due to errors on the part of a financial institution. Taxpayer A requested a rollover of

200704038

Page 4

each of the distributed amounts and signed paperwork purchasing two certificates of deposit believing he was establishing two IRA rollover accounts. However, contrary to Taxpayer A's representations to them, personnel of Financial Institution M invested these amounts in non-IRA accounts.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution to Taxpayer A of Amounts A and T from IRAs Y and X, respectively. Pursuant to this ruling letter, Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days measured from the date of the issuance of this letter ruling to make a rollover contribution of an amount equal to the total of Amounts A and T (except as noted below) to another IRA (or IRAs) described in Code section 408(a). Provided all other requirements of Code section 408(d)(3), except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such IRA contribution, the contribution of an amount not to exceed the total of Amounts A and T (except as noted below) will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of Code section 408(d)(3).

It is noted by the Service that Taxpayer A has attained his required beginning date as that term is defined in Code section 401 (a)(9)(C) (has attained age 70 ½). Thus, this letter ruling does not authorize the rollover of any amount(s) required to be distributed with respect to the 2005 and 2006 calendar years.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations, which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a Power of Attorney on file in this office.

200704038

Page 5

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact I.D. # at . Please address all correspondence to

SE:T:EP:RA:T3.

Sincerely yours,

Frances V Sloan

Frances V. Sloan, Manager

Employee Plans Technical Group 3
Enclosures:

Deleted copy of letter ruling
Notice of Intention to Disclose

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace