PLR 200703013: Tax-year change application receives filing-deadline relief
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer seeking a new tax year originally expected to qualify for an automatic change procedure. Its accountants later determined from the actual data that the automatic procedure was unavailable. The IRS found reasonable conduct and good faith and treated its late Form 1128 as timely under the regulatory relief rules. This resolved only the filing deadline, and the IRS did not determine whether the taxpayer could substantively change to the requested year.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the taxpayer's late Form 1128 be considered timely filed?
- Outcome: Approved for timeliness only; eligibility for the requested tax-year change was not decided.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-38.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200703013
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/19/2007
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.09-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------
-------------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------
---------------------
-------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-------------------------
CC:ITA:B04
PLR-115042-06
Date:
-
October 19, 2006
Legend
X - ---------------------------------------------------------- Date 1 - ------------------ Date 2 – ------------------- Date 3 – ---------------------------
Dear -----------------------------
This letter ruling is in reference to X’s request that its Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change, or Retain a Tax Year, be considered timely filed under the authority contained in § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administrative Regulations. X is requesting permission to change its accounting period, for federal income tax purposes, from a taxable year ending on Date 1, to one ending on Date 2, effective Date 3.
X engaged an accounting firm to research the requirements and to prepare any necessary forms to change its accounting tax year end. Originally, X planned to effect the change using the automatic provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-38, 2002-1 C.B. 1037. However, when the actual data for all of the relevant periods were summarized, X did not qualify to use the automatic provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-38, but still desired to change to a tax year ending on Date 2.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of §301.9100-2 (automatic extensions), such as the instant case, must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3. Requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
PLR-115042-06
2
Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we have concluded that X has acted reasonably and in good faith in respect to this matter. Furthermore, we have determined that the granting of relief in this case will not prejudice the interests of the government within the intendment of § 301.9100-3(c)(1). Accordingly, the requirements of § 301.9100-3 for the granting of relief have been satisfied, and X’s late filed Form 1128 requesting permission to change from a tax year ending on Date 1, to one ending on Date 2, effective Date 3, is considered timely filed.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon facts and representations submitted by X and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as part of an examination process.
This ruling addresses the granting of § 301.9100-3 relief only. No opinion is expressed or implied regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other section of the Internal Revenue Code or Income Tax Regulations that may be applicable thereto, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied as to whether X is permitted under the Code and the applicable regulations to change to the tax year requested in the subject Form 1128.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling showing the deletions proposed to be made in the letter when it is disclosed under § 6110.
In accordance with the provisions of a power of attorney currently on file, we are sending a copy of this letter to the taxpayer’s authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Michael J. Montemurro
Branch Chief
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
Enclosure
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace