PLR 200701020: Commodity-linked note income qualifies for an investment fund’s income test

Number
200701020
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Gross Income Requirement
Code sections
§ 851, § 512, § 6110
Ruling dated
September 26, 2006
Publicly released
January 5, 2007

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2007, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2007
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A regulated investment company invested through a master fund taxed as a partnership. The master fund planned to buy a thirteen-month note with payments linked to a commodity index, including leverage and early-redemption provisions. The fund represented that the note would be fully paid at delivery, require no additional holder payments, impose no mark-to-market margining on the issuer, and would not be marketed as a commodity futures contract. On those facts, the IRS ruled that income and gains from the specified note constitute qualifying income under section 851(b)(2). The decision concerns the described instrument and the feeder fund’s look-through income test.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does income from the specified commodity-linked note count toward the fund’s qualifying-income requirement?
  • Outcome: Approved: the described note’s income and gain qualify under section 851(b)(2).
  • Key authorities: IRC § 851(b)(2); Investment Company Act of 1940 § 2(a)(36); Commodity Exchange Act § 2(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200701020
Release Date: 1/5/2007

Index Number: 851.02-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------, ID No. ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
--------------
---------------------
----------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------
CC:FIP:B02
------------------------------
PLR-133051-06
------------------
Date:
---------------------------
September 26, 2006

-

Legend

Fund = -------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------

Master Fund = -----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------

State = -------------

v = -------------

w = ---

x = --

y = ---------

z = ---

PLR-133051-06
2

Index = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear -------------:

This responds to the request dated June 30, 2006, submitted by your authorized representative on behalf of Fund. Fund requests that the Internal Revenue Service rule that income and gain arising from the commodities-linked note described in this letter will constitute qualifying income to Fund under section 851(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

FACTS

Fund is a statutory trust organized under the laws of State. Fund is registered as an open-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq., as amended (the “1940 Act”). Fund qualifies as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under section 851 of the Code.

Fund is a feeder in a master-feeder structure. Fund invests all of its assets in Master Fund, a statutory trust organized under the laws of State and treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. As a partner in the Master Fund, Fund will look through the Master Fund for purposes of meeting the requirements of section 851(b)(2) of the Code. Master Fund intends to structure its investments so that RICs invested in Master Fund will qualify under section 851(b)(2). Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing all its assets in Master Fund, which has the same investment objective and strategies as Fund.

Master Fund intends to invest in commodities-linked notes having the terms and conditions of the following note (Note): The Note will be issued to Master Fund at a par value of $v. Its payout formula will be determined with reference to Index. Its term will be thirteen months. Master Fund, as holder of the Note, has the right to put the Note to the issuer at the calculated redemption price based on the closing Index as of the end of the next business day after notification to the issuer, or as of the same day closing value if notice is made by 10:00 a.m. If the intraday value of the Index falls to a level that is equal to w% or more below the initial Index value, issuer will have the right up until 4:00 p.m. to call the Note from Master Fund at the calculated redemption price based upon the closing price as of, at the discretion of the issuer, either (i) the date that notice to call the Note is dispatched to Master Fund, or if such day is not a business day, then the immediately following business day, or (ii) the immediately following business day. In addition, if the daily close of the Index falls to a level that is equal to or more than w% below the initial Index value on any day, the Note will “knockout” and automatically redeem based on the closing Index value of the next business day. The repayment obligation upon early redemption, knockout, or at maturity equals the face amount of the

PLR-133051-06
3

Note plus or minus the following adjustment. To calculate the adjustment, multiply the face amount of the Note by (A) a leverage factor of x, and by (B) the percentage of the increase or decrease of the initial Index level compared to the ending Index level for the applicable period. The total is then adjusted to account for a coupon amount calculated at a y rate times the face amount of the Note, for an annual fee amount of z basis points of the notional value (leveraged face amount) of the Note, and for the reversal of an interest factor included in the Index.

Fund makes the following representations with respect to this Note:

(1) The issuer of the Note will receive payment in full of the purchase price of the Note substantially contemporaneously with the delivery of the Note;

(2) Master Fund while holding the Note will not be required to make any payment to the issuer of the Note in addition to the purchase price paid for the Note, whether as margin, settlement payment, or otherwise, during the life of the Note or at maturity;

(3) The issuer of the Note is not subject by the terms of the instrument to mark- to-market margining requirements of the Commodities Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 2, as amended (CEA); and

(4) The Note is not marketed as a contract of sale of a commodity for future delivery (or option on such a contract) subject to the CEA.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 851(b)(2) of the Code provides that a corporation shall not be considered a RIC for any taxable year unless it meets an income test (the “qualifying income requirement”). Under this test, at least 90 percent of its gross income must be derived from certain enumerated sources. Section 851(b)(2) defines qualifying income, in relevant part, as—
dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans (as defined in section 512(a)(5)), and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or securities (as defined in section 2(a)(36) of the 1940 Act) or foreign currencies, or other income (including but not limited to gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to [the RIC’s] business of investing in such stock, securities, or currencies . . . .

Section 2(a)(36) of the 1940 Act defines the term “security” as—
any note, stock, treasury stock, security future, bond, debenture, evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or

PLR-133051-06
4
subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, fractional undivided interest in oil, gas, or other mineral rights, any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege on any security (including a certificate of deposit) or on any group or index of securities (including any interest therein or based on the value thereof), or any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege entered into on a national securities exchange relating to foreign currency, or, in general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a “security”, or any certificate of interest or participation in, temporary or interim certificate for, receipt for, guarantee of, or warrant or right to subscribe to or purchase, any of the foregoing.

Section 2(f)(1) of the CEA provides that the CEA is not applicable to a hybrid instrument that is predominantly a security. Section 2(f)(2) of the CEA provides that a hybrid instrument shall be considered to be predominantly a security if—

(A) the issuer of the hybrid instrument receives payment in full of the purchase price of the hybrid instrument, substantially contemporaneously with the delivery of the hybrid instrument;

(B) the purchaser or holder of the hybrid instrument is not required to make any payment to the issuer in addition to the purchase price paid under subparagraph (A), whether as margin, settlement payment, or otherwise, during the life of the hybrid instrument or at maturity;

(C) the issuer of the hybrid instrument is not subject by the terms of the instrument to mark-to-market margining requirements; and

(D) the hybrid instrument is not marketed as a contract of sale of a commodity for future delivery (or option on such a contract) subject to the CEA.

Section 2(f)(3) of the CEA provides, in part, that for purposes of section 2(f)(2)(C) of the CEA, mark-to-market margining requirements do not include the obligation of an issuer of a secured debt instrument to increase the amount of collateral held in pledge for the benefit of the purchaser of the secured debt instrument to secure the repayment obligations of the issuer under the secured debt instrument.

CONCLUSION

Based on the facts as represented, we rule that income and gain arising from the Note constitute qualifying income to Fund under section 851(b)(2) of the Code.

PLR-133051-06
5

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Susan Thompson Baker
Susan Thompson Baker
Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace