PLR 200651017: Custodial stock transfers to ineligible trusts receive S termination relief

Number
200651017
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations; Shareholder Not an Individual or Permitted Trust or Estate
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
September 5, 2006
Publicly released
December 22, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Custodians transferred S corporation shares held for five minor grandchildren into trusts that were ineligible shareholders. The shares were later transferred to the respective beneficiaries after corrective action began. The IRS held that the intervening S election termination was inadvertent under section 1362(f). It allowed continued S status from the trust-transfer date, provided the original election was valid and no other termination occurred. The five beneficiaries are treated as owners of the previously trust-held shares from that date onward. Failure by the corporation and shareholders to follow the prescribed treatment voids the ruling, and other S eligibility requirements remain unruled.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May S status continue after custodians transfer stock to ineligible trusts and the beneficiaries later receive it?
  • Outcome: Approved: inadvertent termination relief with beneficiary ownership and consistent treatment required.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b), 1361(c)(2), 1362(d)(2), 1362(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200651017
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/22/2006
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00, 1361.01-02
Person To Contact:
---------------------
---------------------------, ID No. -------------
--------------------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------- -------------------
-------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------------
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-132659-06
Date: September 5, 2006
-

Legend

X = -------------------------------------------.
-----------------------

A = ---------------------

B = ----------------------------------
--------------------------

C = ----------------------
--------------------------

D = ------------------
--------------------------

E = -------------------
--------------------------

F = -----------------------
--------------------------

G = --------------------------
--------------------------

H = -------------------
--------------------------

I = -----------------------
--------------------------

PLR-132659-06
2

J = ---------------------------------
--------------------------
K = -----------------------
--------------------------

State = ---------

Date1 = ------------------

Date2 = ------------------

Date3 = -------------------------

Date4 = -------------------

Date5 = -------------------

Trust1 = -------------------------------------

Trust2 = --------------------------------

Trust3 = ---------------------------------

Trust4 = --------------------------------------

Trust5 = ----------------------------------------

Dear ----------------:

This letter responds to your letter dated June 19, 2006, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

The information submitted states that X was incorporated on Date1 under the laws of State, and elected to be an S corporation on Date2. As of Date3, C, D, E, F, and G were the minor grandchildren of A and B. Prior to Date3, A and B transferred stock in X to H as custodian for each C, D, and E, and to J as custodian for each F and G. Each such custodian account was established under State Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA). On Date3, H as custodian for each C, D, and E, and J as

PLR-132659-06
3

custodian for each F and G transferred shares of X to Trust1, Trust2, Trust3, Trust4, and Trust5 (collectively the Trusts). The Trusts, however, were ineligible shareholders and, therefore, X's election to be an S corporation was inadvertently terminated on Date3. On Date4, C, D, E, F, and G initiated corrective action so that X would once again qualify as a small business corporation. On Date5, the shares of X held by Trust1, Trust2, Trust3, Trust4, and Trust5 were transferred to their respective beneficiary.

X represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of X’s S corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation as may be required by the Service.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(a) provides that the term “S corporation” means, for any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation which does not (A) have more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in subsection (c)(2), or an organization described in subsection (c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.

Section 1361(c)(2) provides that certain trusts are permitted as shareholders.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A) provides, in part, that § 1361(c)(2) shall not apply to any foreign trust.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) terminates whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after the discovery of the circumstances resulting in the termination, steps were taken so that the corporation is a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period of inadvertent termination of the S corporation election, agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as

PLR-132659-06
4

an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the termination, the corporation is treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that X’s S corporation election terminated because X had ineligible shareholders. However, we conclude that such termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Consequently, we rule that X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date3, and thereafter, provided that X’s S corporation election was valid and was not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d). Additionally, from Date3 and thereafter, C, D, E, F, and G will be treated as the owner of the shares of X stock previously held by Trust1, Trust2, Trust3, Trust4, and Trust5. If X and its shareholders fail to treat X as described above, this ruling shall be null and void.

Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, we express no opinion on whether X is otherwise eligible to be an S corporation.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Under § 6110(k)(3), it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being mailed to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

David R. Haglund
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace