Potential S termination from departing shareholder is inadvertent

Number
200649008
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
July 18, 2006
Publicly released
December 8, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation issued shares to an employee who was a resident alien. After employment ended, a dispute delayed the contractual transfer of those shares, and the employee returned to a foreign country. A later settlement recognized the transfer as occurring on the agreed closing date. The IRS concluded that any S election termination caused by an ineligible shareholder was inadvertent under section 1362(f). It treated the corporation as continuing its S status from the employee’s departure date and treated the purchasing shareholder as owner of the disputed shares from the earlier closing date. Relief depends on a valid election, no other termination, and the corporation and shareholders reporting consistently with the ruling; failure to do so makes it void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can S status continue despite possible ownership by an ineligible shareholder during a disputed stock transfer?
  • Outcome: Approved: any resulting termination is inadvertent, subject to the stated ownership treatment and continued eligibility conditions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(1), 1362(d)(2), and 1362(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200649008
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/8/2006
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------
---------------------------, ID No. -------------
--------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------ ---------------------
---------------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-113782-06
-
Date: July 18, 2006

Legend

X = --------------
-----------------------

A = -------------------
-------------------------

B = -------------------------------

State = ----------

CountryM = -----------

Date1 = -------------------

Date2 = ----------------------

Date3 = -------------------

Date4 = -------------------

Date5 = -------------------

Date6 = ----------------------

Date7 = ---------------------

PLR-113782-06
2

Dear----. -------:

This letter responds to your letter dated January 31, 2006, together with subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

The information submitted states that X was incorporated on Date1 under the laws of State, and elected to be an S corporation effective Date1. On Date1, A was the sole shareholder of X. On Date2, shares of X were issued to B, a resident alien employed by X. B entered into a shareholders agreement under which A had the right to purchase B’s shares in the event that B’s employment with X was terminated. The shareholders agreement provides that during the term of the agreement, no shareholder shall take any action or transfer any shares in any manner that would cause the revocation or termination of X’s S election under § 1362. On Date3, B’s employment with X was terminated. On Date4, A exercised the right under the shareholders agreement to buy B’s shares with a proposed closing date of Date5. However, B failed to properly tender the stock to perfect a transfer. On or about Date6, B returned to CountryM. A filed a civil lawsuit against B to perfect the transfer of the shares as of Date5. On Date7, A and B entered into a settlement agreement that the transfer of the shares occurred on Date5.

X represents that the circumstances resulting in the potential termination of X’s S corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation as may be required by the Service.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(a) provides that the term “S corporation” means, for any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation which does not (A) have more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in subsection (c)(2), or an organization described in subsection (c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.

PLR-113782-06
3

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) terminates whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after the discovery of the circumstances resulting in the termination, steps were taken so that the corporation is a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period of inadvertent termination of the S corporation election, agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the termination, the corporation is treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that X’s S corporation election may have terminated because X may have had an ineligible shareholder. However, we conclude that, if X’s S corporation election was terminated, such termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Consequently, we rule that X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date6, and thereafter, provided that X’s S corporation election was valid and was not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d). Additionally, from Date5 and thereafter, A will be treated as the owner of the shares of X stock previously held by B. If X and its shareholders fail to treat X as described above, this ruling shall be null and void.

Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, we express no opinion on whether X is otherwise eligible to be an S corporation.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Under § 6110(k)(3), it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-113782-06
4

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being mailed to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Audrey W. Ellis
Senior Counsel, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purpose

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace