PLR 200642007: IRS grants conditional pension funding waiver

Number
200642007
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412, § 6110
Ruling dated
July 24, 2006
Publicly released
October 20, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A family-owned company asked for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for its pension plan. The IRS found that the company had suffered substantial business hardship, but that the hardship appeared temporary and the company was committed to funding the plan. It granted a conditional waiver under section 412(d). The company had to make monthly and remaining required contributions and provide proof of payment. The letter said the waiver would be retroactively void if any condition was not met.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company receive a waiver of its pension plan's minimum funding standard?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to specified contributions and proof of payment.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(d), 412(f); ERISA §§ 303, 304(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00

200642007

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JUL 24 2006

Re:

Company =

This letter constitutes notice that a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the plan year ending June 30, , has been granted for the above-named pension plan subject to the following conditions:

(1) To the extent that contributions are deductible, the Company makes 49 monthly contributions to the Plan of $ each, with the first installment due by June 15, and the last such installment due by June 15, ;

(2) The Company makes all remaining contributions to the Plan in amounts sufficient to meet the minimum funding standard for the Plan for the plan years beginning July 1, , through , by March 15, through (without applying for a waiver of the minimum funding standard); and

(3) The Company provides proof of payment of all contributions described above to of this office, either by fax at or to the following address:

You agreed to these conditions in a letter dated June 1, . If any one of these conditions is not satisfied, the waiver is retroactively null and void.

2

200642007

The conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The amount for which the conditional waiver has been granted is the contribution that would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account to zero as of June 30, .

The Company is a diversified family owned business which operates at three locations and has three separate business lines. The Company was started in as a supplier of well equipment to producers in a number of states. Around the mid- 1980’s prices hit record lows, forcing the Company to scale back store locations and to end its role as an equipment supplier. About this same time, the Company purchased the assets of another firm engaged in .

With a need for further diversifications, the Company started a in . In , a was started which currently operates operating authority. Today, the Company provides .

The Company’s sales have continued to grow slightly the last three years but continued competitive pressure on margins has forced a lower gross margin on all sales. The tractor division has suffered significantly and the Company has had net operating losses during the most recent three-year period. Effective June 30, , accruals to the Plan ceased.

While the Company has suffered a substantial business hardship, the hardship appears temporary and the Company is committed to funding the Plan. Hence, the waiver of the minimum funding standard has been granted to the Plan for the plan year ending June 30, , subject to the conditions stated above.

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA which describe the consequences that would result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized. Please note that any amendment to a profit sharing plan or any other retirement plan (covering employees covered by this plan) maintained by the Company, to increase the liabilities of those plans would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA. Similarly, the establishment of a new profit sharing plan or any other retirement plan by the Company (covering employees covered by this plan) would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA.

3

200642007

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year ending June 30, , the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). For this reason, we suggest that you furnish a copy of this letter to the enrolled actuary who is responsible for the completion of the Schedule B.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager, EP Classification in , to the Manager, EP Compliance Unit in and to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact

Sincerely,

Donna M. Prestia, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace