PLR 200637029: Extended executive bonus formula needs no new shareholder vote

Number
200637029
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Million Dollar Cap - Executive Employee Compensation
Code sections
§ 162
Ruling dated
May 31, 2006
Publicly released
September 15, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company extended an executive's employment agreement while retaining the same formula for a performance based cash bonus. Shareholders had approved the earlier agreement and modification, and the compensation committee could not change the performance targets. The IRS ruled that the unchanged material terms of the performance goal did not need to be disclosed to and approved again by shareholders. That conclusion was conditioned on the committee not changing those terms; the company represented that it otherwise met the applicable section 162(m) requirements.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does extending the executive agreement require renewed shareholder approval of the unchanged performance goal?
  • Outcome: Approved; no new vote is required if the committee does not change the material terms.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 162(m)(4)(C); Treas. Reg. § 1.162-27(e)(4)(vi).

Full text (IRS public release)

Number: 200637029
Release Date: 9/15/2006
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Third Party Communication: None
Index Number: 162.36-00
Date of Communication: Not Applicable

----------------------
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------, ID No. -------------
-----------
Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------- ---------------------
--------------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------
CC:TEGE:EB:EC
PLR-163283-05
Date:
-
May 31, 2006

Company = ----------------------------------------------
------------------------

Executive = -----------------------

Date 1 = -------------------

x = --

Date 2 = -------------------

Date 3 = --------------------------

Dear -------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated December 14, 2005, submitted on behalf of Company by its authorized representative, requesting a ruling under section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, a ruling is requested that the material terms of the performance goal in the Continuation Agreement are not required to be disclosed to and reapproved by Company’s shareholders. The facts, as represented by Company, are as follows.

On Date 1, Company and Executive entered into an Agreement (“Date 1 Agreement”) pursuant to which Company agreed to employ Executive for a period of x years and provide him with certain compensation, including performance-based compensation. Under the Date 1 Agreement, performance-based compensation, in the form of a cash bonus, is determined pursuant to a set formula.
PLR-163283-05
2

The Date 1 Agreement was modified on Date 2 (“Date 2 Modification”). Both the Date 1 Agreement and the Date 2 Modification were disclosed to and approved by Company’s shareholders. Under the Date 1 Agreement and the Date 2 Modification, the Compensation Committee did not have authority to change the targets under the performance goal.

On Date 3, which was prior to the expiration of the employment term in the Date 1 Agreement, Company and Executive entered into an Agreement to extend the employment term in the Date 1 Agreement (“Continuation Agreement”). The Continuation Agreement provides for the payment of performance-based compensation pursuant to the same formula provided in the Date 2 Modification. The Continuation Agreement does not change the material terms of the performance goal, and it does not give the Compensation Committee authority to change the targets under the performance goal.

Company represents that other than the issue for which a ruling is requested, it has satisfied all the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code and section 1.162-27(e) of the Income Tax Regulations.

Section 162(a)(1) allows a deduction for all of the ordinary and necessary business expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business, including a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered.

Section 162(m)(1) provides that a publicly held corporation shall not be allowed a deduction for remuneration with respect to any covered employee to the extent that the amount of such remuneration for the taxable year exceeds $1,000,000.

Section 162(m)(4)(C) excepts from this limitation certain “performance-based compensation” payable solely on account of attaining one or more performance goals, as determined by a compensation committee comprised solely of two or more outside directors, if the material terms under which the compensation is paid, including the performance goals, have been approved by the shareholder of the publicly held corporation.

Section 1.162-27(e)(4)(vi) of the regulations provides that once the material terms of a performance goal are disclosed to and approved by shareholders, no additional disclosure or approval is required unless the compensation committee changes the material terms of the performance goal. If, however, the compensation committee has the authority to change the targets under a performance goal after shareholder approval of the goal, the material terms of the performance goal must be disclosed and reapproved by shareholders no later than the first shareholder meeting that occurs in the fifth year following the year in which shareholders previously approved the performance goal.
PLR-163283-05
3

Based on the facts submitted, and provided the compensation committee does not change the material terms of the performance goal, we rule as follows:

The material terms of the performance goal in the Continuation Agreement are not required to be disclosed and reapproved by Company’s shareholders.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the Federal tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used of cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely yours,

_______
Kenneth M. Griffin
Assistant Branch Chief
Executive Compensation Branch
Office of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government
Entities)

Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace