PLR 200634053: Seized IRA funds receive a new rollover window after their return

Number
200634053
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Individual Retirement Accounts
Code sections
§ 408, § 72, § 6110
Ruling dated
May 22, 2006
Publicly released
August 25, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An organization seized funds from a taxpayer's two IRAs under a warrant because it believed the money was connected to illegal drug sales. The funds were later found unconnected to that activity and returned after the 60 day rollover period had passed. The IRS found that the taxpayer could not access the money during the seizure and had sought a waiver promptly after its release. It waived the rollover deadline for the two seized amounts and gave the taxpayer 60 days from the ruling letter to contribute their total to a rollover IRA, subject to the other rollover requirements. The request refers to an “Amount L” absent from the legend; the operative ruling names Amounts G and H, totaling Amount K.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can funds seized from IRAs and returned after the rollover deadline receive a waiver?
  • Outcome: Approved for the two seized amounts, subject to the other rollover requirements.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
200634053

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION

Uniform Issue List 408.00-00
MAY 22 2006
T:EP:RA:T3
Legend:
Bank A =

Organization B =

Date E =

Date F =
Amount G =
Amount H =
Amount K =
Code L =
County Office M =

Court N =

IRA X =

IRA Y =

Page 2 200634053

Dear

This is in response to your request dated January 9, 2006, submitted by your authorized representative, for a ruling to waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Correspondence dated April 6, 2006, supplemented the request.

Under penalty of perjury, you have submitted the following facts and representations:

You, age 46, represent that funds, totaling Amount K, were seized from IRA X and IRA Y by Organization B. You assert that your failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to your inability to access the IRA funds after they were seized by Organization B. You further represent that Amount K has not been used for any other purpose

You maintained IRA X and IRA Y at Bank A. On Date E, 2005, Organization B, under authority of Code L, seized a total of Amount K from IRA X and IRA Y pursuant to a seizure warrant. IRA X contained Amount G and IRA Y contained Amount H. The seizure warrant was issued pursuant to sections 18.2-249 and 19.2- 368, et seq. of Code L: Amount K was delivered to County Office M for “storage pending further Order of [Court N]”.

The IRA funds were seized because Organization B believed that such funds were used in connection with, furnished in exchange for, or were proceeds from the illegal sale or distribution of a controlled substance.

However, it was subsequently shown that there was no connection between the funds seized from IRA X and IRA Y and any illegal activity concerning the possession or distribution of controlled substances. Accordingly, the funds were released by Organization B, and returned to you on Date F, 2006. Such date was after the 60-day time period for rolling over the funds had expired.

Based on the facts and representations, you request that the Internal Revenue Service waive the 60 day rollover requirement with respect to your contribution of Amount L into IRA Y because the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience.

With respect to your ruling request, section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers. Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the

Page 3 200634053

Code does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if (i)the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or (ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual

from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt

such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience,

including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003), provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information you presented demonstrates that you had no control over the Amounts G and H being seized from IRA X an IRA Y. During the time following the seizure of Amounts G and H, such amounts were under the control County Office M, and you had no ability to access them. Upon release of Amounts G and H you immediately sought a waiver of the 60-day rollover period from the IRS.

Page 4 200634053

Accordingly, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to Amounts G and H. You are granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute Amounts G and H (totaling Amount K), into a Rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, Amount K will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact (ID - ) at ( ) - . Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3. Sincerely yours,

[illegible]

Frances V. Sloan, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 3

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

CC:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace