PLR 200625005: Extra time granted to request dual consolidated loss closing agreement
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation split off part of a subsidiary's stock and sold the rest, triggering rules that could recapture dual consolidated losses. The corporation and subsidiary missed the deadline to request a closing agreement with the IRS to avoid that recapture. The IRS treated the request deadline as a regulatory election deadline and found that the late filing relief standards were met. It granted them 60 days from the ruling date to submit the closing agreement request. The extension does not establish that they qualify to enter into the agreement.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the corporation and subsidiary submit their closing agreement request after the deadline?
- Outcome: Approved; a 60-day extension was granted to submit the request.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iii), 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv), 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2000-42.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200625005
Release Date: 6/23/2006
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1503.04-04
------------------------
Person To Contact:
----------------------
----------------------, ID No. ---------------
-----------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------------------
---------------------
-----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC: INTL – PLR-110678-06
- Date:
March 15, 2006-
Taxpayer = -------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EIN: ----------------
Subsidiary = ---------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EIN: ----------------
Date A = --------------------------
Dear -----------------
This is in response to a letter dated February 9, 2006, requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to submit a request to enter into a closing agreement pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2000-42, 2000-2 C.B. 394. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by the appropriate parties. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.
Prior to Date A, Subsidiary was a member of Taxpayer’s consolidated group. On Date A, Taxpayer distributed a portion of Subsidiary’s stock in a split-off transaction to holders of a certain class of Taxpayer stock in exchange for such shareholders’ Taxpayer stock. Simultaneously, Taxpayer sold the remaining Subsidiary stock to an 2
In re: PLR-110678-06
unrelated corporation. The split-off transaction constituted a triggering event under Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iii) and, in order to avoid the recapture of certain dual consolidated losses, Taxpayer and Subsidiary were required pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(iv) to enter into a closing agreement with the Internal Revenue Service.
Section 3.02 of Rev. Proc. 2000-42 provides that a taxpayer must enter into a closing agreement with the Internal Revenue Service before the taxpayer files its tax return for the taxable year of a triggering event. Alternatively, the taxpayer may submit its request for a closing agreement by the due date of its return (including extensions) for the triggering event year. Taxpayer and Subsidiary neglected to enter into such an agreement in a timely manner.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
The request to enter into a closing agreement is a regulatory election as defined in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) to grant an extension of time, provided the requirements set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) are satisfied.
Based on the facts and information submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer and Subsidiary have satisfied Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer and Subsidiary are granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to submit a request to enter into a closing agreement pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2000-42.
The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer and Subsidiary are otherwise eligible to enter into a closing agreement. Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a).
3
In re: PLR-110678-06
A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the request to enter into the closing agreement.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to Taxpayer’s authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
___
Christopher L. Trump
Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 4
Office of Chief Counsel (International)
Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace