PLR 200622031: More time for controlled group value restoration election

Number
200622031
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Controlled Groups
Code sections
§ 382, § 383, § 1504, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 14, 2006
Publicly released
June 2, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

After a corporate ownership change, a parent and a related life insurance company missed the deadline to elect to restore part of the company's value to the parent for purposes of the limit on using pre-change tax losses. The IRS found that the parties had reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, acted in good faith, and requested relief before the IRS discovered the missed election. It gave the parent's successor and the related company 45 days to file the election under Treas. Reg. § 1.382-8(h), with a copy of the ruling attached. The extension was conditioned on the affected taxpayers' aggregate tax liability being no lower than it would have been if they had elected on time.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent and related company file their controlled group value restoration election late?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a 45-day filing deadline and an aggregate tax liability condition.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 382; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.382-8(h), 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200622031
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/2/2006
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 382.12-16
Person To Contact:
---------------------------
--------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------
---------------------
------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:1
PLR-155890-05
Date:
February 14, 2006

LEGEND:

Parent = ---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Parent’s Successor = -----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Electing Sub = ---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

$X = ---------------------

$Y = -----------------

$Z = -----------------

Year = -------

Date 1 = ----------------------

Date 2 = -------------------

Date 3 = ---------------------------

Company Official 1 = --------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
PLR-155890-05
2

Company Official 2 = ---------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear -----------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated October 31, 2005, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election. The extension is being requested in order to allow Parent (by Parent's Successor) and Electing Sub to file an election to restore $X of value to Parent under § 1.382-8(h) of the Income Tax Regulations (hereinafter referred to as the "Election"). Additional information was received in subsequent correspondences dated December 20, 2005, December 21, 2005, February 1, 2006, February 7, 2006 and February 8, 2006. The material information is summarized below.

In Year, Parent was the common parent of a consolidated group. Parent also owned all the stock of three life insurance companies, including Electing Sub. Parent did not make an election under § 1504(c)(2) to treat these corporations as includible corporations. Electing Sub was a component member of Parent's controlled group within the meaning of § 1.382-8(e)(2) and (3). Parent experienced a § 382 ownership change on Date 1 at which time Electing Sub had a value of $Y. Also on that date, Electing Sub had $Z of “pre-change capital losses” within the meaning of § 1.383- 1(c)(2). It has been represented that other than the $Z of pre-change capital losses, Electing Sub has no other pre-change losses within the meaning of § 1.382-2(a)(2). On Date 2, after several restructuring transactions which resulted in Parent becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent’s Successor, also a life insurance company, Parent’s Successor liquidated Parent in a transaction described in § 332.

Section 382(a) provides that the amount of the taxable income of any new loss corporation for any post-change year which may be offset by pre-change losses shall not exceed the § 382 limitation for such year. Under § 382(b)(1), the § 382 limitation is determined by multiplying the value of the old loss corporation by the applicable long term tax-exempt rate. A special rule designed to prevent "double counting" by controlled groups is set forth in § 1.382-8. Section 1.382-8(c)(1) requires the value of the stock of each component member of the controlled group be reduced by the value of the stock owned by that component member in any other component member. For purposes of applying § 1.382-8, a consolidated group, loss group, or loss subgroup is treated as a single corporation pursuant to § 1.382-8(f). Component members of a controlled group can elect under § 1.382-8(c)(2) to restore some or all of the value to
PLR-155890-05
3

another component member. The election to restore value is made by following the procedures set forth in § 1.382-8(h).

The Election was required to be filed on or before Date 3, the due date of Parent's income tax return for its Year tax year. However, for various reasons, Parent and Electing Sub failed to make the Election in a timely manner.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., § 1.382-8(h)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Parent (by Parent's Successor) and Electing Sub to file the Election, provided they show that they acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the government.

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent's Successor, Company Official 1 and Company Official 2 explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file the Election. The information establishes that Parent’s Successor and Electing Sub reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise Parent’s Successor and Electing Sub to make the Election, the request for relief was filed before the failure to make the Election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service, and that the interests of the government will not be prejudiced if relief is granted. See §§ 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) and (v).

Based on the facts and information submitted, including the representations made, we conclude that Parent (by Parent's Successor) and Electing Sub have shown that they acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, an extension of time is granted under § 301.9100-3 until 45 days from the date on this letter for Parent (by Parent's Successor) and Electing Sub to file the
PLR-155890-05
4

Election to restore $X of value to Parent. A copy of this letter must be attached to the Election.

The above extension of time is conditioned on the taxpayers' (Parent's, Parent Successor’s and the component members of Parent's controlled group) tax liability (if any) not being lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to the taxpayers' tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the Director's office upon audit of the Federal income tax returns involved. Further, no opinion is expressed as to the Federal income tax effect, if any, if it is determined that the taxpayers' liability is lower. Section 301.9100-3(c).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In particular, we express no opinion with respect to whether an ownership change occurred; whether Parent and Electing Sub were component members of a controlled group; or as to values or amounts of pre-change losses. In addition, we express no opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other section of the Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, filing the Election late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling.

For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3 we relied on certain statements and representations made by Parent's Successor, Company Official 1, and Company Official 2 under penalties of perjury. However, the Director should verify all essential facts. Moreover, notwithstanding that the extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the Election, any penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable still apply.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
PLR-155890-05
5

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

Sincerely,

_______
Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace