PLR 200621022: Manufacturer receives a conditional pension funding waiver

Number
200621022
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 28, 2006
Publicly released
May 26, 2006

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2006, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2006
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a manufacturer's pension plan a waiver of its minimum funding requirement under IRC § 412(d), subject to specified contributions and later funding deadlines. The company reported reduced orders and losses, and described cost cuts and a new product as steps toward recovery. If it misses any condition, the waiver becomes retroactively void. The IRS also warned that increasing benefits or establishing another plan while the waived deficiency remains unamortized could trigger consequences under § 412(f). Many dates and financial amounts are blank in the public release.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company's pension plan receive a minimum funding waiver during financial hardship?
  • Outcome: Approved subject to contribution and funding conditions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(d), 412(f); ERISA §§ 303, 304(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

FEB. 28 2006

In re:

Company =

This letter constitutes notice that a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the above-named plan for the plan year ending July 31, , has been granted subject to the following conditions:

(1) The Company makes contributions to the Plan totaling the amount of the quarterly contributions originally due on November 15, , and February 15, , for the plan year ending July 31, , by February 16, .

(2) The Company makes the required quarterly contributions to the Plan due on May 15, , and August 15, , for the plan year ending July 31, , in a timely manner, and meets the minimum funding standard for the Plan for the plan year ending July 31, , by April 15, .

(3) The Company makes the required quarterly contributions to the Plan due on November 15, , February 15, , May 15, , and August 15, , for the plan year ending July 31, , in a timely manner, and meets the minimum funding standard for the Plan for the plan year ending July 31, , by April 15, .

You agreed to these conditions in letter sent via facsimile dated February 10, . If any one of these conditions is not satisfied, the waiver is retroactively null and void.

This conditional waiver has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The amount for which this conditional waiver has been granted is the contribution that would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account to zero as of July 31, 2005.

The Company’s primary business is the production of large and complicated assembly machines and equipment used by other manufacturers.

The current financial hardship was brought on by a reduction in customer orders. The primary customer base for the Company is other manufacturers. When the economy slowed in the early part of the decade, the manufacturers invested less in capital equipment. As the economy improved, many manufacturers moved production outside of the United States, thus reducing demand in the Company’s primary market. The Company’s revenues fell from in fiscal year ending October 31, , to in the year ending October 31, . However, in the year ending October 31, , the revenues increased to . The Company had a loss of in the year ending October 31, . For the years ending October 31, , and , the Company had losses of , and . For the year ending October 31, , the Company had a profit of .

In order to effect a recovery of its business, the Company has taken a number of steps to firm up its financial situation. Among these steps is an agreement in November , with the Company’s labor force that has eliminated costs that will allow the Company to be competitive in the smaller machine markets. The Company has also developed a new product for which the Company expects to receive a flow of new orders. The initial machine is expected to be in production at the customer's plant in early fall of , although payment for this machine is not expected to be received until early . An order for a second machine is expected upon the successful installation of the first machine.

Because the actions taken by the Company have improved its financial position, the waiver for the plan year ending July 31, , has been granted, subject to the conditions set forth above.

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA which describe the consequences that would result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized. Please note that any amendment to a profit sharing plan or any other retirement plans (covering employees covered by this plan) maintained by the Company, to increase the liabilities of those plans would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA. Similarly, the establishment of a new profit sharing plan or any other retirement plan by the Company (covering employees covered by this plan) would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year ending July 31, , the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). For this reason, we suggest that you furnish a copy of this letter to the enrolled actuary who is responsible for the completion of the Schedule B.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager, EP Classification in , to the Manager, EP Compliance Unit in , and to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact .

Sincerely yours,
Donna M. Prestia, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace